Conductivity (fracture flow)

Test Your Knowledge

Conductivity Quiz

Instructions: Choose the best answer for each question.

1. What does conductivity measure in the context of fracture flow?

a) The pressure drop across a fracture. b) The volume of fluid that can pass through a fracture per unit time.

2. What is the formula for calculating conductivity?

a) Conductivity = Permeability / Fracture Width b) Conductivity = Permeability x Fracture Width

3. Which of the following factors contributes to high conductivity?

a) Low permeability b) Narrow fracture width

4. How is conductivity typically measured?

a) Meters per second b) Millidarcy-feet (md-ft)

5. What is NOT a real-world application of conductivity in the oil & gas industry?

a) Determining the best locations for drilling wells. b) Predicting the flow behavior of oil and gas in a reservoir. c) Analyzing the chemical composition of hydrocarbons.

Conductivity Exercise

Problem:

You are working on a project to characterize a fractured shale reservoir. You have obtained the following data from a core sample:

• Permeability: 10 millidarcy (md)
• Fracture width: 0.05 feet

Task:

1. Calculate the conductivity of the fracture using the provided data.
2. Explain how the conductivity value you calculated impacts the flow potential of this fracture.

Solution:

Techniques

Conductivity in Fracture Flow: A Comprehensive Guide

Chapter 1: Techniques for Measuring Fracture Conductivity

Several techniques are employed to measure or estimate fracture conductivity in oil and gas reservoirs. These techniques range from direct measurements in core samples to indirect estimations using geophysical logs and seismic data. The choice of technique depends on factors such as the reservoir properties, accessibility, and the level of detail required.

Direct Measurement Techniques:

• Core Analysis: This involves extracting core samples from the reservoir and performing laboratory measurements to determine fracture permeability and aperture. Specialized techniques like thin-section microscopy, image analysis, and fluid flow experiments are used to characterize the fractures. Limitations include the small sample size and potential for alteration during extraction.

• Fracture Injection Tests (FITs): FITs involve injecting fluid into a fracture and monitoring the pressure response. Analysis of the pressure data allows estimation of fracture conductivity. This is particularly useful in characterizing induced fractures created during hydraulic fracturing. Limitations include the potential for non-Darcy flow effects at high flow rates and the difficulty in interpreting results in complex fracture networks.

Indirect Estimation Techniques:

• Well Logging: Various logging tools can indirectly infer fracture properties. For example, image logs (such as Formation MicroScanner - FMS and Borehole Televiewer - BHTV) provide images of the borehole wall, revealing fracture orientation, aperture, and density. Other logs like density, neutron, and resistivity logs can be used to infer porosity and permeability, which are related to fracture properties. However, these logs only provide information within a limited radius around the borehole.

• Seismic Surveys: Seismic data can be used to identify fracture zones on a larger scale. Seismic attributes sensitive to fracture density and orientation (e.g., amplitude variation with offset - AVO, azimuthal anisotropy) can be used to infer the presence and extent of fractures. However, seismic data has limited resolution and resolving individual fracture conductivity remains challenging.

• Production Data Analysis: Analysis of production data from wells can provide indirect information about the overall conductivity of the fracture network. Decline curve analysis and reservoir simulation incorporating fracture properties can be used to infer the impact of fractures on fluid flow. The interpretation, however, is often complex and requires accurate reservoir models.

Chapter 2: Models for Fracture Conductivity

Numerous models exist to describe and predict fracture conductivity. These models range from simple analytical solutions to complex numerical simulations. The choice of model depends on the complexity of the fracture network and the available data.

Simple Models:

• Parallel Plate Model: This simple model assumes that the fracture is a single, parallel-sided opening. Conductivity is calculated as the product of permeability and aperture. While simple, it neglects the roughness and tortuosity of real fractures.

• Cubic Law: This model accounts for the effect of fracture roughness on conductivity. It relates conductivity to the cube of the fracture aperture, offering a more realistic representation compared to the parallel plate model.

Complex Models:

• Discrete Fracture Network (DFN) Models: These models represent the fracture network as a collection of individual fractures with defined geometries and properties. DFN models can simulate complex fracture patterns and fluid flow within the network. They are computationally intensive but offer the most realistic representation of fracture flow.

• Dual Porosity/Dual Permeability Models: These models represent the reservoir as two interconnected continua: the matrix and the fracture network. Fluid flow between these two systems is considered, which is important in reservoirs where fractures act as preferential pathways for fluid flow.

• Stochastic Fracture Models: These models generate realistic fracture networks based on statistical distributions of fracture parameters. They are useful when limited data are available or for investigating the uncertainty associated with fracture characterization.

Chapter 3: Software for Fracture Conductivity Analysis

Various software packages are available to assist with the analysis and modeling of fracture conductivity. These packages provide tools for data processing, model building, and simulation.

• Petrel (Schlumberger): A widely used reservoir simulation and characterization software that includes modules for fracture modeling and analysis.

• CMG (Computer Modelling Group): Another popular reservoir simulation package capable of handling complex fracture networks.

• FracMan (Golder Associates): Specifically designed for hydraulic fracture modeling, it can simulate fracture propagation and conductivity.

• Open-source packages: Several open-source tools and libraries (e.g., Python with relevant packages) are available for specific aspects of fracture analysis, such as DFN generation and fluid flow simulation. These offer flexibility but may require more programming expertise.

Chapter 4: Best Practices for Fracture Conductivity Assessment

Accurate assessment of fracture conductivity is crucial for successful reservoir management. Several best practices should be followed to ensure reliable results.

• Integrated Approach: Combine multiple techniques (e.g., core analysis, well logging, seismic) to obtain a comprehensive understanding of fracture properties.

• Data Quality Control: Ensure the quality and accuracy of input data, which is essential for reliable modeling and simulation.

• Model Calibration and Validation: Calibrate and validate models using available data (e.g., production data, pressure tests) to ensure model accuracy.

• Uncertainty Quantification: Account for the uncertainties associated with the input data and model parameters to assess the reliability of predictions.

• Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Effective communication and collaboration between geologists, geophysicists, and reservoir engineers are critical for successful fracture characterization.

Chapter 5: Case Studies of Fracture Conductivity in Oil & Gas Reservoirs

Several case studies illustrate the importance of understanding fracture conductivity in various reservoir settings. These examples highlight how the techniques and models discussed above are applied to real-world situations. (Specific case studies would be inserted here, detailing reservoir characteristics, applied techniques, results, and implications for production optimization.) These examples would demonstrate the impact of high and low conductivity zones on production performance, reservoir simulation accuracy, and the effectiveness of hydraulic fracturing strategies. The case studies could include examples from tight gas sands, shale gas reservoirs, and fractured carbonate reservoirs, showcasing the variability in fracture characteristics and the necessity of tailored approaches.