هندسة المكامن

Scorpion Plot

مخطط العقرب: أداة لاذعة لتحليل عمليات إعادة تجهيز الآبار

في صناعة النفط والغاز، تعتبر **عمليات إعادة تجهيز الآبار** ضرورية لتجديد الآبار المتقادمة، ومعالجة مشكلات الإنتاج، وإطالة عمر الحقل. ومع ذلك، يتطلب تحديد ما إذا كانت عملية إعادة التجهيز مجدية اقتصاديًا تحليلًا دقيقًا. وهنا يأتي دور **مخطط العقرب**، وهو أداة قوية لتصور وتقييم التأثير الاقتصادي لعمليات إعادة التجهيز.

ما هو مخطط العقرب؟

مخطط العقرب هو تمثيل بياني للعلاقة بين **إنتاج البئر** (عادةً معدل النفط أو الغاز) و **تكلفة العمليات**، مع التركيز بشكل خاص على تأثير عمليات إعادة التجهيز. يحصل المخطط على اسمه من شكله:

  • الذيل: يمثل أداء إنتاج البئر **قبل** عملية إعادة التجهيز. يظهر هذا القسم عادةً اتجاهًا تنازليًا في الإنتاج.
  • الجسم: يمثل **عملية إعادة التجهيز** نفسها، ويصور التكلفة الأولية التي تم تكبدها.
  • اللاذع: يمثل **أداء الإنتاج بعد عملية إعادة التجهيز**، مما يظهر الزيادة المحتملة في الإنتاج بعد التدخل.

لماذا هو مفيد؟

يوفر مخطط العقرب مقارنة مرئية واضحة بين تكلفة وفوائد عملية إعادة التجهيز، مما يسمح باتخاذ قرارات مستنيرة:

  • المجدوى الاقتصادية: يشير طول اللاذع بالنسبة إلى جسم العقرب إلى ربحية عملية إعادة التجهيز. يشير اللاذع الطويل ذو التأثير الكبير إلى أن تكلفة عملية إعادة التجهيز مبررة، بينما يشير اللاذع القصير غير الفعال إلى أن التدخل لم يكن مجديًا من الناحية المالية.
  • فعالية عملية إعادة التجهيز: تُبرز مقارنة مخططات العقرب لآبار مختلفة أو استراتيجيات مختلفة لإعادة التجهيز الفعالية النسبية لكل تدخل.
  • تحديد الاتجاهات: يكشف تحليل شكل العقرب عن مشكلات محتملة:
    • لاذع مسطح: قد يشير إلى أن عملية إعادة التجهيز لم تعالج السبب الرئيسي لتناقص الإنتاج.
    • لاذع متناقص بسرعة: قد يشير إلى نجاح قصير المدى، لكنه يشير إلى مشكلات كامنة.
    • جسم متزايد بشكل حاد: يشير إلى استثمار كبير في عملية إعادة التجهيز، ويتطلب زيادة كبيرة في الإنتاج بعد عملية إعادة التجهيز لتبرير التكلفة.

مثال:

تخيل بئرين، كلاهما خضع لعمليات إعادة تجهيز. يشهد البئر أ زيادة كبيرة في الإنتاج بعد إعادة التجهيز، مما يؤدي إلى لاذع طويل ذو تأثير كبير. من ناحية أخرى، يُظهر البئر ب زيادة طفيفة في الإنتاج، مما يؤدي إلى لاذع قصير ضعيف. يُظهر مخطط العقرب بوضوح المجدوى الاقتصادية الأفضل لعملية إعادة التجهيز التي تم تنفيذها على البئر أ.

ما وراء الرسم البياني:

بينما يوفر مخطط العقرب تمثيلًا مرئيًا قيمًا، من المهم مراعاة عوامل إضافية للتقييم الشامل لعملية إعادة التجهيز:

  • تاريخ البئر: يعد فهم اتجاهات الإنتاج السابقة والتدخلات أمرًا بالغ الأهمية للتحليل الدقيق.
  • ظروف الحقل: تؤثر العوامل مثل خصائص الخزان، وتفاصيل إتمام البئر، وأنماط الإنتاج الإقليمية على فعالية عملية إعادة التجهيز.
  • تفصيل التكلفة: يساعد تحليل تفصيل تكلفة عملية إعادة التجهيز على تحديد مجالات التحسين المحتملة.

الاستنتاج:

يُعد مخطط العقرب أداة قوية لتصور وتقييم أداء عمليات إعادة التجهيز، مما يساعد في اتخاذ قرارات مستنيرة وتحقيق أقصى قيمة اقتصادية من الآبار المتقادمة. من خلال فهم العلاقة بين التكلفة والفائدة وتحليل اتجاهات الإنتاج، يُمكن لهذا التمثيل المرئي تمكين المشغلين من اتخاذ خيارات استراتيجية بشأن عمليات إعادة التجهيز، مما يساهم في النهاية في النجاح طويل الأجل لعمليات النفط والغاز.


Test Your Knowledge

Scorpion Plot Quiz:

Instructions: Choose the best answer for each question.

1. What does the "tail" of a Scorpion Plot represent?

a) The cost of the workover b) The well's production after the workover c) The well's production before the workover d) The overall production decline of the well

Answer

c) The well's production before the workover

2. What does a long, impactful "stinger" in a Scorpion Plot indicate?

a) The workover was unsuccessful b) The workover was highly profitable c) The workover cost more than the production gains d) The well's production declined rapidly after the workover

Answer

b) The workover was highly profitable

3. Which of the following is NOT a factor to consider when evaluating a Scorpion Plot?

a) The well's production history b) The type of workover performed c) The oil price at the time of the workover d) The reservoir characteristics of the well

Answer

c) The oil price at the time of the workover

4. A Scorpion Plot with a "flat stinger" might suggest that:

a) The workover effectively addressed the production decline b) The workover was extremely expensive c) The workover did not address the root cause of the decline d) The well is nearing the end of its production life

Answer

c) The workover did not address the root cause of the decline

5. Why is the Scorpion Plot a valuable tool for workover analysis?

a) It simplifies the analysis of complex well data b) It visually displays the economic impact of a workover c) It predicts future production trends after a workover d) It eliminates the need for detailed well history analysis

Answer

b) It visually displays the economic impact of a workover

Scorpion Plot Exercise:

Scenario:

You are reviewing two Scorpion Plots for different wells that underwent workovers.

  • Well A: Shows a gradual decline in production before the workover (tail), a significant investment in the workover (body), and a steep increase in production immediately after the workover, followed by a gradual decline (stinger).
  • Well B: Shows a steep decline in production before the workover (tail), a moderate investment in the workover (body), and a slight increase in production after the workover, followed by a continued decline (stinger).

Task:

Analyze the two Scorpion Plots and answer the following questions:

  1. Which well experienced a more successful workover based on the Scorpion Plot?
  2. What insights can you draw about the potential causes of the production decline in each well before the workover?
  3. Which well would you recommend for further investment in workovers based on the Scorpion Plots?

Exercice Correction

1. **Well A** experienced a more successful workover as it shows a significant production increase following the workover, indicating that the intervention addressed the production decline effectively. 2. **Well A:** The gradual decline before the workover suggests a potential issue with natural reservoir depletion or gradual decline in well performance. **Well B:** The steep decline suggests a more rapid and severe production decline, potentially due to a sudden issue like wellbore damage, plugging, or a significant change in reservoir conditions. 3. **Well A** shows a more promising response to workover, justifying further investment to potentially extend the well's production life. Well B, despite a modest improvement, shows a less impactful workover and might require further evaluation and possibly a different intervention strategy.


Books

  • Petroleum Engineering Handbook: This comprehensive handbook likely includes a section on workover analysis and may touch upon Scorpion Plots.
  • Production Optimization of Oil and Gas Wells: Books focusing on production optimization techniques often cover workover evaluation methods like the Scorpion Plot.
  • Reservoir Engineering: Books on reservoir engineering may include discussions on production forecasting and workover strategies, potentially mentioning the Scorpion Plot.

Articles

  • "Workover Analysis using the Scorpion Plot" by [Author Name]: Search for articles specifically titled "Scorpion Plot" or "Workover Analysis" to find relevant content.
  • "A Comprehensive Guide to Workover Operations in the Oil and Gas Industry": Articles summarizing workover practices may include the Scorpion Plot as a decision-making tool.
  • Industry Journals: Publications like SPE Journal, Journal of Petroleum Technology, and other oil and gas journals might feature articles discussing workover evaluation techniques and potentially utilizing Scorpion Plots.

Online Resources

  • SPE (Society of Petroleum Engineers): The SPE website, including their online library and search engine, could contain resources on workover analysis and Scorpion Plots.
  • Google Scholar: Use Google Scholar to search for academic publications that mention "Scorpion Plot" or "Workover Analysis" in the context of oil and gas.
  • Oil and Gas Industry Websites: Websites of major oil and gas companies or industry organizations might have articles or presentations discussing workover evaluation methods.

Search Tips

  • Use specific keywords: "Scorpion Plot," "Workover Analysis," "Oil & Gas Production," "Economic Evaluation."
  • Combine keywords: Try phrases like "Scorpion Plot workover evaluation" or "economic analysis using Scorpion Plot."
  • Use advanced search operators:
    • "filetype:pdf" to find PDF documents
    • "site:spe.org" to search only within the SPE website
    • "related: [URL]" to find similar resources to a website you know

Techniques

Chapter 1: Techniques for Creating a Scorpion Plot

Creating an effective Scorpion Plot requires careful data collection and processing. The core components are pre-workover production data, workover cost data, and post-workover production data. Here's a breakdown of the techniques involved:

1. Data Acquisition:

  • Production Data: Gather historical production data (oil or gas rate, water cut, etc.) for the well, ideally spanning several months before the workover. Data should be consistent and reliable, often sourced from SCADA systems or production databases. Regularly spaced intervals (e.g., daily, weekly, monthly) are preferred.

  • Workover Cost Data: Compile a detailed breakdown of all costs associated with the workover. This includes direct costs (e.g., labor, materials, equipment rental) and indirect costs (e.g., engineering, permits, transportation). Accurate cost accounting is essential for reliable economic analysis.

2. Data Processing and Cleaning:

  • Data Normalization: Ensure consistent units and data formats across all datasets. Address missing data points through interpolation or exclusion, documenting the method used.

  • Data Cleaning: Identify and correct outliers or erroneous data points. This may involve statistical analysis or consultation with field personnel.

  • Data Aggregation: Depending on the desired level of detail, production data might be aggregated (e.g., daily to monthly averages).

3. Plot Construction:

  • Time Axis: The horizontal axis represents time, showing the pre-workover, workover period, and post-workover periods.

  • Production Axis (Y-axis): The vertical axis represents well production (e.g., barrels of oil per day or cubic meters of gas per day).

  • Cost Representation: The workover cost is typically represented by a vertical bar or rectangle positioned on the time axis, corresponding to the duration of the workover. The height of this bar represents the total cost.

  • Plotting the Data: Plot the pre-workover production data as a line, showing the decline curve. The post-workover data is plotted as a continuation of this line, ideally showing an upward trend (the "stinger").

4. Analysis and Interpretation:

  • Visual Inspection: Assess the length and steepness of the "stinger" relative to the "body" (workover cost) to evaluate the workover's economic viability.

  • Quantitative Metrics: Calculate metrics such as the rate of production increase after the workover, the return on investment (ROI), and the payback period. These metrics supplement the visual interpretation.

Chapter 2: Models for Scorpion Plot Enhancement

While a basic Scorpion Plot provides a clear visual, incorporating additional models can enhance its analytical power and provide deeper insights into workover effectiveness.

1. Production Decline Curve Modeling:

  • Pre-workover Decline: Fit a suitable decline curve model (e.g., exponential, hyperbolic, power law) to the pre-workover production data to extrapolate the expected production without the workover. This provides a baseline for comparison.

  • Post-workover Decline: Similarly, model the post-workover production data to forecast future production and assess the long-term impact of the intervention. The model choice depends on the reservoir characteristics and production behavior.

2. Economic Modeling:

  • Net Present Value (NPV): Calculate the NPV of the workover, considering the future revenue generated by the increased production, discounted by a suitable discount rate.

  • Internal Rate of Return (IRR): Determine the IRR of the workover, representing the discount rate at which the NPV becomes zero. This provides a measure of the project's profitability.

  • Payback Period: Calculate the time required for the increased production revenue to offset the workover cost.

3. Reservoir Simulation Integration:

  • For more complex scenarios, integrate reservoir simulation results into the Scorpion Plot. Simulation can provide a more accurate prediction of post-workover production and help assess the impact of different workover strategies.

4. Incorporating Uncertainty:

  • Use probabilistic methods (e.g., Monte Carlo simulation) to account for uncertainty in production forecasts and cost estimates. This creates a range of possible outcomes, providing a more robust assessment of workover viability.

5. Sensitivity Analysis:

  • Conduct sensitivity analyses to determine the impact of key parameters (e.g., oil price, production decline rate, workover cost) on the workover's economic viability. This helps identify critical uncertainties and potential risks.

Chapter 3: Software for Scorpion Plot Creation

Several software packages can be used to create and enhance Scorpion Plots. The choice depends on the available data, the desired level of sophistication, and user expertise.

1. Spreadsheet Software (Excel, Google Sheets):

  • Suitable for simple Scorpion Plots with basic data visualization. Functions and charting tools can be used to create the plot and perform basic calculations.

  • Limitations: Limited capabilities for advanced modeling and complex data analysis.

2. Reservoir Simulation Software (Eclipse, CMG, etc.):

  • Advanced software packages capable of integrating reservoir simulation results into the analysis. They provide a sophisticated platform for modeling and forecasting production.

  • Requires specialized expertise and may be overkill for simpler workover analyses.

3. Production Data Analysis Software (Petrel, KAPPA, etc.):

  • These specialized software packages offer advanced tools for data processing, visualization, and analysis. They often include functionalities for decline curve analysis and economic evaluation.

  • Usually more expensive than spreadsheet software, but provide greater functionality and efficiency for managing large datasets.

4. Custom Programming (Python, Matlab):

  • Provides maximum flexibility and control over the entire process, allowing for the development of customized tools and workflows. Requires programming expertise.

  • Allows for seamless integration with other data sources and tools, enabling sophisticated analysis.

5. Specialized Workover Analysis Software:

  • Some companies offer specialized software specifically designed for workover analysis, which may include tools for creating and interpreting Scorpion Plots.

Chapter 4: Best Practices for Effective Scorpion Plot Analysis

The effectiveness of a Scorpion Plot depends not only on its construction but also on the best practices employed during its creation and interpretation.

1. Data Quality:

  • Use accurate and reliable data from trusted sources. Data validation and quality control are crucial.

  • Address missing data points appropriately. Document the methods used for data imputation or exclusion.

2. Model Selection:

  • Choose appropriate decline curve models that reflect the reservoir characteristics and production history. Justify the model choice.

  • Consider the limitations of the chosen model and account for potential uncertainties.

3. Cost Accounting:

  • Develop a comprehensive and accurate cost breakdown for the workover. Include both direct and indirect costs.

  • Consider potential cost overruns and contingencies when evaluating the economic viability.

4. Economic Assumptions:

  • Clearly define all economic assumptions, such as discount rate, oil/gas price forecasts, and operating costs.

  • Conduct sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of variations in these assumptions.

5. Interpretation and Communication:

  • Present the Scorpion Plot clearly and concisely, using appropriate labels and legends.

  • Explain the key findings and implications of the analysis. Avoid overinterpreting the results.

6. Integration with other Analyses:

  • Consider the Scorpion Plot as part of a broader workover evaluation process. Integrate it with other analyses, such as reservoir simulation, production forecasts, and risk assessments.

Chapter 5: Case Studies of Scorpion Plot Applications

Several case studies illustrate the practical applications and value of Scorpion Plots in workover decision-making. (Note: Specific case study details would require confidential data, which is not available here. However, the following outlines potential scenarios.)

Case Study 1: Comparing Workover Techniques:

  • Two different workover techniques are considered for a well experiencing a production decline. Scorpion Plots for both techniques are compared, showing the cost and production response for each. The plot highlights the superior economic viability of one technique compared to the other.

Case Study 2: Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Stimulation Treatment:

  • A well receives a stimulation treatment as part of a workover. The Scorpion Plot illustrates the cost of the stimulation and the subsequent production response. The plot indicates whether the stimulation was cost-effective.

Case Study 3: Assessing the Impact of Different Completion Strategies:

  • Multiple wells with different completion strategies undergo workovers. Scorpion Plots are generated for each well, illustrating the impact of the completion strategy on workover effectiveness and economic viability.

Case Study 4: Predicting Workover ROI:

  • Using pre-workover decline curve modeling and post-workover production forecasts, a Scorpion Plot is created to predict the future ROI of a proposed workover. This helps make informed decisions about whether to proceed with the intervention.

Case Study 5: Optimizing Workover Spending:

  • Analysis of several workovers using Scorpion Plots helps identify trends and potential areas for cost optimization in future interventions. This reduces overall spending while maintaining productivity.

In each case study, the Scorpion Plot provides a clear visual representation of the cost-benefit relationship, facilitating informed decision-making and maximizing the return on investment from workover activities. The plots should be accompanied by detailed cost breakdowns and production data to support the analysis.

مصطلحات مشابهة
هندسة المكامن
  • Cross Plot مخططات التقاطع: فك أسرار باطن…
  • Hall Plot مخطط هول: أداة قوية لفهم سلوك…
  • Horner Plot كشف أسرار الخزان: قوة مخطط هو…
  • Nolte-Smith Plot مخطط نولته-سميث: دليل مرئي لن…
  • Pickett Plot فكّ رموز أسرار الأرض: فهم رسم…
  • P/Z Plot فهم التقسيم: فك رموز مخطط P/Z…
  • Stick Plot رسم العصا: قصة شخصية العصا عن…
معالجة النفط والغاز
  • Plot plan خطة الموقع: البلو بِرِنت لنج…
تخطيط وجدولة المشروع
  • Resource Plots مخططات الموارد: تصور شريان حي…
الجيولوجيا والاستكشاف
  • Tadpole Plot فك تشابك مخطط الضفدع: دليل مر…

Comments


Jose Zamalloa
on 13 فبراير، 2025 at 1:57 م

Can we use scorpion plots to estimate how much longer we need to fish on a good oil rate well? Lets suppose we have an ESP fish in an 8000 bfpd, 60% WC, (3200 bopd). The WO guys estimated 35 days to recover the fish and 7 days to run the new ESP. However after 25 days they have recovered only 60% of the fish and the recovery rate is medium-low. For such an oil rate, how many more days should we keep on fishing? Cheers.

Response

Yes, scorpion plots (or decision trees for fishing operations) can be useful for estimating how much longer you should continue fishing. They help in determining when to switch from fishing to sidetracking or other contingency plans based on recovery progress, rate of retrieval, and remaining economic value.

Let's analyze your situation:

  • Well production:
    • 3200 bopd, 8000 bfpd, 60% WC
  • Fishing operation timeline:
    • 35 days estimated for full fish recovery
    • 7 days to run the new ESP
    • 25 days elapsed, 60% of fish recovered
    • Recovery rate: medium-low

Estimating Remaining Fishing Time

1. Recovery Rate

  • 25 days for 60% recovery1.5 days per % (on average)
  • Remaining fish: 40%
  • If the same rate continues: 40% × 1.5 days = 60 days
  • However, since recovery rate is medium-low, progress may slow down further.

2. Decision Based on Oil Deferment

  • Production loss per day: 3200 bopd
  • Lost oil so far: 3200 × 25 = 80,000 bbl
  • Additional loss for 60 more days: 3200 × 60 = 192,000 bbl
  • If you stop now and sidetrack or mill, you could be back online faster.

3. Scorpion Plot Decision

  • If you recover at least 15% more fish in the next ~10 days, fishing may still be viable.
  • If progress stalls below ~10% in the next 10 days, consider switching to a sidetrack/milling plan.

Conclusion

  • If recovery remains slow (~60 more days needed), consider an alternative plan.
  • If the next 10 days show at least 15% more fish recovered, continue.
  • Given the oil loss, a cost-benefit analysis is crucial—if sidetracking is faster, it might be the better choice.

To estimate the economic breakeven for continuing fishing versus sidetracking, we need to compare lost revenue due to deferred oil production with the cost of fishing and sidetracking.


Given Data

  • Oil Rate: 3200 bopd
  • Oil Price: Assume $80/bbl (you can adjust)
  • Fishing Progress: 60% recovered in 25 days, medium-low rate
  • Fishing Cost: Assume $50,000/day (varies by region & contractor)
  • Sidetrack Cost: Assume $4M (depends on well depth & geology)
  • Time Estimates:
    • Fishing (if continued): 60 more days
    • Sidetrack & ESP Run: 35 days total

Scenario 1: Continue Fishing (60 More Days)

  • Lost Revenue:
    • 60 days × 3200 bopd × $80 = $15.36M lost oil revenue
  • Fishing Cost:
    • 60 days × $50,000 = $3M
  • Total Loss: $18.36M

Scenario 2: Sidetrack & ESP (35 Days)

  • Lost Revenue:
    • 35 days × 3200 bopd × $80 = $8.96M lost oil revenue
  • Sidetrack Cost:
    • $4M
  • Total Loss: $12.96M

Comparison & Decision

  • Fishing (60 days): $18.36M total loss
  • Sidetrack (35 days): $12.96M total loss
  • Difference: Sidetrack saves $5.4M

If recovery rate doesn’t improve significantly in the next 10 days, sidetracking is the better option.

 

Let’s refine the calculation with more precise cost assumptions. Please confirm or adjust the following values based on your actual well economics:

Key Cost Inputs

  1. Oil Price: $80/bbl (adjust if different)
  2. Fishing Cost: $50,000/day (confirm or adjust)
  3. Sidetrack Cost: $4M (confirm or adjust)
  4. ESP Installation Time & Cost:
    • 7 days to run the ESP (included in both scenarios)
    • $500,000 ESP install cost (adjust if needed)
  5. Well Productivity Loss:
    • Decline rate: If this is a high-productivity well with no immediate decline, we assume constant 3200 bopd
    • If there is a decline factor, we can adjust this.

Key Inputs to Confirm or Adjust

  1. Oil Price: $80/bbl (or specify)
  2. Fishing Cost: $50,000/day (or actual value)
  3. Sidetrack Cost: $4M (or actual value)
  4. ESP Installation Cost: $500,000 (or actual value)
  5. ESP Installation Time: 7 days (confirm or adjust)
  6. Well Productivity:
    • Current Rate: 3200 bopd (confirm)
    • Decline Rate (if applicable): Assume 0% for now, but adjust if needed.
  7. Fishing Efficiency:
    • Current 60% recovered in 25 days, medium-low progress
    • Expected recovery rate in the next 10 days? (e.g., +10% or less?)

 


POST COMMENT
captcha
إلى