في صناعة النفط والغاز، تعتبر **عمليات إعادة تجهيز الآبار** ضرورية لتجديد الآبار المتقادمة، ومعالجة مشكلات الإنتاج، وإطالة عمر الحقل. ومع ذلك، يتطلب تحديد ما إذا كانت عملية إعادة التجهيز مجدية اقتصاديًا تحليلًا دقيقًا. وهنا يأتي دور **مخطط العقرب**، وهو أداة قوية لتصور وتقييم التأثير الاقتصادي لعمليات إعادة التجهيز.
ما هو مخطط العقرب؟
مخطط العقرب هو تمثيل بياني للعلاقة بين **إنتاج البئر** (عادةً معدل النفط أو الغاز) و **تكلفة العمليات**، مع التركيز بشكل خاص على تأثير عمليات إعادة التجهيز. يحصل المخطط على اسمه من شكله:
لماذا هو مفيد؟
يوفر مخطط العقرب مقارنة مرئية واضحة بين تكلفة وفوائد عملية إعادة التجهيز، مما يسمح باتخاذ قرارات مستنيرة:
مثال:
تخيل بئرين، كلاهما خضع لعمليات إعادة تجهيز. يشهد البئر أ زيادة كبيرة في الإنتاج بعد إعادة التجهيز، مما يؤدي إلى لاذع طويل ذو تأثير كبير. من ناحية أخرى، يُظهر البئر ب زيادة طفيفة في الإنتاج، مما يؤدي إلى لاذع قصير ضعيف. يُظهر مخطط العقرب بوضوح المجدوى الاقتصادية الأفضل لعملية إعادة التجهيز التي تم تنفيذها على البئر أ.
ما وراء الرسم البياني:
بينما يوفر مخطط العقرب تمثيلًا مرئيًا قيمًا، من المهم مراعاة عوامل إضافية للتقييم الشامل لعملية إعادة التجهيز:
الاستنتاج:
يُعد مخطط العقرب أداة قوية لتصور وتقييم أداء عمليات إعادة التجهيز، مما يساعد في اتخاذ قرارات مستنيرة وتحقيق أقصى قيمة اقتصادية من الآبار المتقادمة. من خلال فهم العلاقة بين التكلفة والفائدة وتحليل اتجاهات الإنتاج، يُمكن لهذا التمثيل المرئي تمكين المشغلين من اتخاذ خيارات استراتيجية بشأن عمليات إعادة التجهيز، مما يساهم في النهاية في النجاح طويل الأجل لعمليات النفط والغاز.
Instructions: Choose the best answer for each question.
1. What does the "tail" of a Scorpion Plot represent?
a) The cost of the workover b) The well's production after the workover c) The well's production before the workover d) The overall production decline of the well
c) The well's production before the workover
2. What does a long, impactful "stinger" in a Scorpion Plot indicate?
a) The workover was unsuccessful b) The workover was highly profitable c) The workover cost more than the production gains d) The well's production declined rapidly after the workover
b) The workover was highly profitable
3. Which of the following is NOT a factor to consider when evaluating a Scorpion Plot?
a) The well's production history b) The type of workover performed c) The oil price at the time of the workover d) The reservoir characteristics of the well
c) The oil price at the time of the workover
4. A Scorpion Plot with a "flat stinger" might suggest that:
a) The workover effectively addressed the production decline b) The workover was extremely expensive c) The workover did not address the root cause of the decline d) The well is nearing the end of its production life
c) The workover did not address the root cause of the decline
5. Why is the Scorpion Plot a valuable tool for workover analysis?
a) It simplifies the analysis of complex well data b) It visually displays the economic impact of a workover c) It predicts future production trends after a workover d) It eliminates the need for detailed well history analysis
b) It visually displays the economic impact of a workover
Scenario:
You are reviewing two Scorpion Plots for different wells that underwent workovers.
Task:
Analyze the two Scorpion Plots and answer the following questions:
1. **Well A** experienced a more successful workover as it shows a significant production increase following the workover, indicating that the intervention addressed the production decline effectively. 2. **Well A:** The gradual decline before the workover suggests a potential issue with natural reservoir depletion or gradual decline in well performance. **Well B:** The steep decline suggests a more rapid and severe production decline, potentially due to a sudden issue like wellbore damage, plugging, or a significant change in reservoir conditions. 3. **Well A** shows a more promising response to workover, justifying further investment to potentially extend the well's production life. Well B, despite a modest improvement, shows a less impactful workover and might require further evaluation and possibly a different intervention strategy.
Creating an effective Scorpion Plot requires careful data collection and processing. The core components are pre-workover production data, workover cost data, and post-workover production data. Here's a breakdown of the techniques involved:
1. Data Acquisition:
Production Data: Gather historical production data (oil or gas rate, water cut, etc.) for the well, ideally spanning several months before the workover. Data should be consistent and reliable, often sourced from SCADA systems or production databases. Regularly spaced intervals (e.g., daily, weekly, monthly) are preferred.
Workover Cost Data: Compile a detailed breakdown of all costs associated with the workover. This includes direct costs (e.g., labor, materials, equipment rental) and indirect costs (e.g., engineering, permits, transportation). Accurate cost accounting is essential for reliable economic analysis.
2. Data Processing and Cleaning:
Data Normalization: Ensure consistent units and data formats across all datasets. Address missing data points through interpolation or exclusion, documenting the method used.
Data Cleaning: Identify and correct outliers or erroneous data points. This may involve statistical analysis or consultation with field personnel.
Data Aggregation: Depending on the desired level of detail, production data might be aggregated (e.g., daily to monthly averages).
3. Plot Construction:
Time Axis: The horizontal axis represents time, showing the pre-workover, workover period, and post-workover periods.
Production Axis (Y-axis): The vertical axis represents well production (e.g., barrels of oil per day or cubic meters of gas per day).
Cost Representation: The workover cost is typically represented by a vertical bar or rectangle positioned on the time axis, corresponding to the duration of the workover. The height of this bar represents the total cost.
Plotting the Data: Plot the pre-workover production data as a line, showing the decline curve. The post-workover data is plotted as a continuation of this line, ideally showing an upward trend (the "stinger").
4. Analysis and Interpretation:
Visual Inspection: Assess the length and steepness of the "stinger" relative to the "body" (workover cost) to evaluate the workover's economic viability.
Quantitative Metrics: Calculate metrics such as the rate of production increase after the workover, the return on investment (ROI), and the payback period. These metrics supplement the visual interpretation.
While a basic Scorpion Plot provides a clear visual, incorporating additional models can enhance its analytical power and provide deeper insights into workover effectiveness.
1. Production Decline Curve Modeling:
Pre-workover Decline: Fit a suitable decline curve model (e.g., exponential, hyperbolic, power law) to the pre-workover production data to extrapolate the expected production without the workover. This provides a baseline for comparison.
Post-workover Decline: Similarly, model the post-workover production data to forecast future production and assess the long-term impact of the intervention. The model choice depends on the reservoir characteristics and production behavior.
2. Economic Modeling:
Net Present Value (NPV): Calculate the NPV of the workover, considering the future revenue generated by the increased production, discounted by a suitable discount rate.
Internal Rate of Return (IRR): Determine the IRR of the workover, representing the discount rate at which the NPV becomes zero. This provides a measure of the project's profitability.
Payback Period: Calculate the time required for the increased production revenue to offset the workover cost.
3. Reservoir Simulation Integration:
4. Incorporating Uncertainty:
5. Sensitivity Analysis:
Several software packages can be used to create and enhance Scorpion Plots. The choice depends on the available data, the desired level of sophistication, and user expertise.
1. Spreadsheet Software (Excel, Google Sheets):
Suitable for simple Scorpion Plots with basic data visualization. Functions and charting tools can be used to create the plot and perform basic calculations.
Limitations: Limited capabilities for advanced modeling and complex data analysis.
2. Reservoir Simulation Software (Eclipse, CMG, etc.):
Advanced software packages capable of integrating reservoir simulation results into the analysis. They provide a sophisticated platform for modeling and forecasting production.
Requires specialized expertise and may be overkill for simpler workover analyses.
3. Production Data Analysis Software (Petrel, KAPPA, etc.):
These specialized software packages offer advanced tools for data processing, visualization, and analysis. They often include functionalities for decline curve analysis and economic evaluation.
Usually more expensive than spreadsheet software, but provide greater functionality and efficiency for managing large datasets.
4. Custom Programming (Python, Matlab):
Provides maximum flexibility and control over the entire process, allowing for the development of customized tools and workflows. Requires programming expertise.
Allows for seamless integration with other data sources and tools, enabling sophisticated analysis.
5. Specialized Workover Analysis Software:
The effectiveness of a Scorpion Plot depends not only on its construction but also on the best practices employed during its creation and interpretation.
1. Data Quality:
Use accurate and reliable data from trusted sources. Data validation and quality control are crucial.
Address missing data points appropriately. Document the methods used for data imputation or exclusion.
2. Model Selection:
Choose appropriate decline curve models that reflect the reservoir characteristics and production history. Justify the model choice.
Consider the limitations of the chosen model and account for potential uncertainties.
3. Cost Accounting:
Develop a comprehensive and accurate cost breakdown for the workover. Include both direct and indirect costs.
Consider potential cost overruns and contingencies when evaluating the economic viability.
4. Economic Assumptions:
Clearly define all economic assumptions, such as discount rate, oil/gas price forecasts, and operating costs.
Conduct sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of variations in these assumptions.
5. Interpretation and Communication:
Present the Scorpion Plot clearly and concisely, using appropriate labels and legends.
Explain the key findings and implications of the analysis. Avoid overinterpreting the results.
6. Integration with other Analyses:
Several case studies illustrate the practical applications and value of Scorpion Plots in workover decision-making. (Note: Specific case study details would require confidential data, which is not available here. However, the following outlines potential scenarios.)
Case Study 1: Comparing Workover Techniques:
Case Study 2: Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Stimulation Treatment:
Case Study 3: Assessing the Impact of Different Completion Strategies:
Case Study 4: Predicting Workover ROI:
Case Study 5: Optimizing Workover Spending:
In each case study, the Scorpion Plot provides a clear visual representation of the cost-benefit relationship, facilitating informed decision-making and maximizing the return on investment from workover activities. The plots should be accompanied by detailed cost breakdowns and production data to support the analysis.
Jose Zamalloa
on 13 فبراير، 2025 at 1:57 مCan we use scorpion plots to estimate how much longer we need to fish on a good oil rate well? Lets suppose we have an ESP fish in an 8000 bfpd, 60% WC, (3200 bopd). The WO guys estimated 35 days to recover the fish and 7 days to run the new ESP. However after 25 days they have recovered only 60% of the fish and the recovery rate is medium-low. For such an oil rate, how many more days should we keep on fishing? Cheers.
Response
Yes, scorpion plots (or decision trees for fishing operations) can be useful for estimating how much longer you should continue fishing. They help in determining when to switch from fishing to sidetracking or other contingency plans based on recovery progress, rate of retrieval, and remaining economic value.
Let's analyze your situation:
Estimating Remaining Fishing Time
1. Recovery Rate
2. Decision Based on Oil Deferment
3. Scorpion Plot Decision
Conclusion
To estimate the economic breakeven for continuing fishing versus sidetracking, we need to compare lost revenue due to deferred oil production with the cost of fishing and sidetracking.
Given Data
Scenario 1: Continue Fishing (60 More Days)
Scenario 2: Sidetrack & ESP (35 Days)
Comparison & Decision
If recovery rate doesn’t improve significantly in the next 10 days, sidetracking is the better option.
Let’s refine the calculation with more precise cost assumptions. Please confirm or adjust the following values based on your actual well economics:
Key Cost Inputs
Key Inputs to Confirm or Adjust