Cost estimating in the oil and gas industry is a complex process, requiring accuracy and reliability to ensure successful project execution. While various methods exist, Parametric Cost Estimating stands out as a powerful and widely adopted approach. This article delves into the intricacies of this methodology, exploring its principles, advantages, and limitations within the specific context of oil and gas projects.
Understanding Parametric Cost Estimating
Parametric cost estimating, sometimes referred to as top-down estimating, leverages statistical relationships between historical project data and key parameters. These parameters can include:
By analyzing historical data and identifying these relationships, cost estimators can develop parametric models that predict project costs based on the specific parameters of the current project.
Advantages of Parametric Cost Estimating in Oil & Gas
Speed and Efficiency: Parametric models provide quick and efficient cost estimates, especially in the early stages of project development when detailed designs are limited.
Early Cost Forecasting: This methodology enables early cost forecasting, allowing for better project planning and budgeting even before detailed engineering and procurement are complete.
Improved Accuracy: With a robust historical data set, parametric models can achieve a high level of accuracy, particularly for projects with similar characteristics to past projects.
Cost Sensitivity Analysis: Parametric models allow for cost sensitivity analysis by varying key parameters, enabling cost optimization and risk assessment.
Applications in Oil & Gas
Parametric cost estimating finds extensive application in various aspects of oil and gas projects, including:
Limitations of Parametric Cost Estimating
While powerful, parametric cost estimating has limitations:
Dependence on Historical Data: Accurate models require reliable and extensive historical data, which may not always be available, especially for novel or highly specialized projects.
Assumptions and Simplifications: Parametric models rely on assumptions and simplifications, which can introduce inaccuracies if not carefully considered.
Limited Accuracy for Unique Projects: For highly unique or complex projects with few historical parallels, parametric models may provide less accurate estimates.
Conclusion
Parametric cost estimating remains a valuable tool in the oil and gas industry, providing quick, efficient, and relatively accurate cost estimates. However, it's crucial to understand its limitations and combine it with other cost estimating techniques, such as detailed bottom-up estimates, for comprehensive project cost assessment. By leveraging the strengths of different methodologies, oil and gas companies can enhance their cost management practices and improve project success rates.
Instructions: Choose the best answer for each question.
1. Which of the following is NOT a key parameter used in Parametric Cost Estimating?
a) Physical characteristics (size, weight) b) Performance characteristics (production rate) c) Project Manager's experience d) Productivity (labor hours, equipment efficiency)
c) Project Manager's experience
2. Parametric Cost Estimating is also known as:
a) Bottom-up estimating b) Top-down estimating c) Detailed estimating d) Activity-based estimating
b) Top-down estimating
3. What is a major advantage of Parametric Cost Estimating?
a) It can be used for all types of projects regardless of complexity. b) It provides detailed cost breakdowns for individual activities. c) It allows for early cost forecasting even in the absence of detailed designs. d) It completely eliminates the need for other cost estimating methods.
c) It allows for early cost forecasting even in the absence of detailed designs.
4. What is a key limitation of Parametric Cost Estimating?
a) It can only be used for small-scale projects. b) It requires extensive historical data which may not always be available. c) It does not allow for cost sensitivity analysis. d) It cannot be combined with other cost estimating techniques.
b) It requires extensive historical data which may not always be available.
5. Which of the following is NOT a typical application of Parametric Cost Estimating in the oil and gas industry?
a) Establishing initial cost estimates for feasibility studies. b) Developing budget estimates for different design options. c) Creating detailed cost breakdowns for individual construction activities. d) Predicting costs for building and installing facilities.
c) Creating detailed cost breakdowns for individual construction activities.
Scenario: You are working on a project to develop a new oil well. You have gathered the following historical data for similar projects:
| Project | Well Depth (meters) | Total Project Cost ($) | |---|---|---| | A | 1000 | 10,000,000 | | B | 1500 | 15,000,000 | | C | 2000 | 20,000,000 |
Task:
1. Parametric Model:
From the historical data, we can observe a linear relationship between well depth and total project cost.
Cost per Meter:
Estimated Cost for 1800 Meter Well: $10,000 per meter * 1800 meters = $18,000,000
2. Assumptions and Limitations:
Conclusion:
The developed parametric model provides a preliminary estimate based on available historical data. It highlights the importance of considering assumptions and limitations while using such models. For a more accurate cost estimate, additional factors and detailed analysis should be considered.
Chapter 1: Techniques
Parametric cost estimating relies on establishing statistical relationships between historical project data and key project parameters. Several techniques are employed to achieve this:
Regression Analysis: This statistical method identifies the relationship between dependent variables (costs) and independent variables (parameters). Linear regression is commonly used, but more complex models like multiple regression can account for multiple parameters influencing cost. The resulting equation forms the parametric model.
Index Number Method: This approach utilizes indices (e.g., construction cost indices, equipment price indices) to adjust historical costs to reflect current market conditions. It's particularly useful for quick estimations when detailed data isn't readily available. However, it relies on the accuracy of the indices and may not capture project-specific nuances.
Ratio Estimating: This technique involves using ratios derived from past projects to estimate costs for similar components or activities in the current project. For instance, the cost of piping per unit length in a previous project can be used to estimate piping costs in a new project, adjusting for differences in material and labor costs.
Learning Curve Analysis: This technique considers the impact of experience and repetition on cost. It assumes that as similar tasks are repeated, the cost per unit decreases. This is relevant when projects involve repetitive activities, such as well drilling or pipeline construction.
The choice of technique depends on the availability of data, project complexity, and desired accuracy level. Often, a combination of these techniques is used for a more robust estimate.
Chapter 2: Models
Parametric models are the core of parametric cost estimating. They translate project parameters into cost predictions. Several model types exist:
Simple Linear Models: These models express cost as a linear function of a single parameter. For example, the cost of a pipeline might be estimated as a function of its length.
Multiple Linear Regression Models: These models consider multiple parameters simultaneously. For instance, the cost of an offshore platform could be a function of its size, water depth, and equipment specifications.
Non-linear Models: In cases where the relationship between parameters and costs isn't linear, non-linear models are needed. These can be more complex to develop and require specialized statistical software.
Hybrid Models: These models combine different techniques and model types to improve accuracy and address specific project aspects. For example, a hybrid model might use regression analysis for major components and ratio estimating for minor ones.
Developing accurate and reliable parametric models requires careful selection of parameters, data cleaning, statistical analysis, and model validation. Regular model updates and refinement are crucial to maintain accuracy over time.
Chapter 3: Software
Several software packages facilitate parametric cost estimating, offering features like data management, statistical analysis, model building, and reporting:
Spreadsheet Software (Excel): Simple parametric models can be developed and managed using spreadsheet software. However, more complex models might require specialized statistical add-ins.
Statistical Software (R, SPSS, SAS): These packages provide powerful statistical tools for regression analysis, model fitting, and diagnostics. They're particularly useful for developing and validating complex parametric models.
Dedicated Cost Estimating Software: Specialized software packages cater to cost estimation in various industries, including oil and gas. These often include pre-built models, databases, and reporting features. Examples include Primavera P6, CostOS, and others.
The choice of software depends on the complexity of the models, the size of the data set, and the specific needs of the project team.
Chapter 4: Best Practices
Effective parametric cost estimating relies on adherence to best practices:
Data Quality: Accurate and reliable historical data is paramount. Data should be cleaned, validated, and consistently formatted.
Parameter Selection: Carefully select parameters that are relevant, measurable, and have a significant impact on cost.
Model Validation: Validate the model using independent data to ensure its accuracy and reliability. Compare model predictions with actual costs from past projects.
Regular Updates: Regularly update the model with new data to reflect changes in technology, market conditions, and project practices.
Transparency and Documentation: Clearly document the model's assumptions, limitations, and data sources. This ensures transparency and facilitates future use and updates.
Integration with other methods: Use parametric estimates in conjunction with other estimating methods (e.g., bottom-up estimating) for a more comprehensive cost assessment.
Chapter 5: Case Studies
Case Study 1: Estimating the cost of a new offshore platform: A parametric model was developed using regression analysis, considering parameters like platform size, water depth, and equipment specifications. The model's accuracy was validated against historical data from similar projects. The model provided a quick and reasonably accurate estimate, facilitating early project planning and budgeting.
Case Study 2: Predicting the cost of pipeline construction: A ratio estimating technique was employed to estimate the cost of pipeline construction based on the cost per unit length from previous projects, adjusted for factors like terrain and pipeline diameter. The approach provided a rapid estimate in the early stages of the project.
Case Study 3: Assessing the cost impact of different design options for a refinery: A parametric model was used to simulate the cost impact of varying design parameters such as capacity, technology, and safety features. This enabled cost optimization and selection of the most cost-effective design.
These case studies illustrate the versatility and effectiveness of parametric cost estimating in different aspects of oil and gas projects. The specific approach and model used depend heavily on the project context and available data.
Comments