Reservoir Engineering

Screening Effect

The Screening Effect: A Challenge in Proppant Transport for Enhanced Oil Recovery

Introduction:

In the realm of oil and gas production, maximizing hydrocarbon recovery often involves techniques like hydraulic fracturing. This process entails injecting a high-pressure fluid mixture, known as "fracture fluid," into a reservoir to create artificial fractures and increase permeability. The fracture fluid typically carries proppants, which are small, hard particles designed to hold the fracture open after the fluid pressure is released.

However, a phenomenon known as the screening effect can pose a significant challenge to achieving optimal proppant placement within these fractures. This article delves into the screening effect, its causes, and its impact on oil and gas production.

Understanding the Screening Effect:

The screening effect describes the tendency of proppants to segregate within the fracture fluid due to density differences when the fluid velocity drops below a certain threshold.

  • Fluid Velocity and Turbulence: When the fluid is moving rapidly, turbulence helps to keep the proppants suspended evenly throughout the fluid.
  • Velocity Drop and Settling: As the fluid velocity decreases, the turbulent forces subside, and heavier proppants settle out, creating zones of higher proppant concentration near the bottom of the fracture and leaving the upper portions relatively devoid of proppant.

Causes of the Screening Effect:

Several factors can contribute to the screening effect:

  • Proppant Density: Heavier proppants are more prone to settling than lighter ones.
  • Fluid Viscosity: Lower viscosity fluids allow proppants to settle more readily.
  • Fracture Geometry: Fracture width and height can influence the rate of proppant settling.
  • Flow Rate: As the flow rate decreases, the velocity of the fluid decreases, increasing the risk of proppant segregation.

Consequences of the Screening Effect:

The screening effect can have detrimental consequences for oil and gas production:

  • Reduced Fracture Conductivity: Uneven proppant distribution leads to reduced fracture conductivity, limiting the flow of hydrocarbons.
  • Inefficient Production: The lower flow rates from poorly propped fractures result in reduced oil and gas production.
  • Increased Costs: Inefficient proppant placement may necessitate additional fracturing stages, increasing costs.

Mitigation Strategies:

Several strategies can be employed to mitigate the screening effect:

  • Optimize Proppant Selection: Using lighter proppants or proppants with higher sphericity can reduce settling.
  • Control Flow Rate: Maintaining a sufficiently high flow rate during the fracturing operation can minimize velocity drop.
  • Utilize Proppant Additives: Adding suspending agents to the fracture fluid can increase viscosity and minimize proppant settling.
  • Optimize Fluid Design: Utilizing fluids with higher viscosity and better proppant carrying capacity can help maintain proppant suspension.
  • Advanced Frac Design: Employing advanced fracturing techniques like staged fracturing or multi-stage fracturing can help optimize proppant placement.

Conclusion:

The screening effect is a crucial factor to consider in hydraulic fracturing operations. Understanding its causes and implementing mitigation strategies is essential for maximizing proppant placement and achieving efficient oil and gas production. By carefully selecting proppants, controlling flow rates, and utilizing advanced fracturing techniques, operators can effectively address the screening effect and ensure the long-term success of their fracturing operations.


Test Your Knowledge

Quiz on the Screening Effect in Proppant Transport

Instructions: Choose the best answer for each question.

1. What is the primary cause of the screening effect in hydraulic fracturing? a) The high pressure of the fracture fluid. b) The density difference between proppants and the fracture fluid. c) The presence of natural fractures in the reservoir rock. d) The use of high-viscosity fracturing fluids.

Answer

b) The density difference between proppants and the fracture fluid.

2. Which of the following factors contributes to the screening effect? a) Increasing the fluid flow rate. b) Using lighter proppants. c) Increasing the fracture width. d) Lowering the fluid viscosity.

Answer

d) Lowering the fluid viscosity.

3. What is a major consequence of the screening effect? a) Increased reservoir permeability. b) Reduced fracture conductivity. c) Improved oil and gas production. d) Increased proppant carrying capacity of the fracturing fluid.

Answer

b) Reduced fracture conductivity.

4. Which of the following is NOT a mitigation strategy for the screening effect? a) Using proppant additives like suspending agents. b) Optimizing the proppant selection. c) Decreasing the fluid flow rate during fracturing. d) Employing staged fracturing techniques.

Answer

c) Decreasing the fluid flow rate during fracturing.

5. The screening effect can be best described as: a) The tendency of proppants to clump together. b) The filtration of proppants through the fracture walls. c) The uneven distribution of proppants within the fracture. d) The degradation of proppants due to chemical reactions.

Answer

c) The uneven distribution of proppants within the fracture.

Exercise on the Screening Effect

Scenario:

You are a hydraulic fracturing engineer tasked with designing a fracture treatment for a new oil well. The well is in a tight shale formation with low permeability. You have chosen to use a high-viscosity fracturing fluid with 20/40 mesh sand proppants. During the design process, you realize that the screening effect could be a concern.

Task:

  1. Identify at least 3 factors that could contribute to the screening effect in this scenario.
  2. Propose at least 2 mitigation strategies that you can implement to address the potential screening effect.
  3. Explain how each of your mitigation strategies will help to reduce the screening effect.

Exercise Correction

**1. Factors contributing to the screening effect:** * **Proppant Density:** 20/40 mesh sand is relatively heavy, making it prone to settling. * **Fluid Viscosity:** While high viscosity is beneficial for proppant carrying, a rapid decline in viscosity as the fluid flows down the fracture can cause proppants to settle. * **Fracture Geometry:** The narrow and complex fracture network in shale formations can increase the risk of proppant settling in certain areas. **2. Mitigation Strategies:** * **Optimize Proppant Selection:** Consider using a lighter proppant, like ceramic proppants, which have a lower density. * **Utilize Proppant Additives:** Add suspending agents to the fracturing fluid to increase viscosity and minimize proppant settling. **3. Explanation of Mitigation Strategies:** * **Lighter Proppant:** By switching to a lighter proppant, the density difference between the proppants and the fluid will be reduced, lowering the tendency of proppants to settle. * **Suspending Agents:** Suspending agents will increase the overall viscosity of the fracturing fluid, effectively slowing down the settling velocity of the proppants. This will help maintain a more even distribution of proppants within the fracture.


Books

  • "Hydraulic Fracturing: Fundamentals, Operations, and Optimization" by John A. Economides and Kenneth G. Nolte: Provides a comprehensive overview of hydraulic fracturing, including sections on proppant transport and the screening effect.
  • "Fractured Reservoirs" by John C. S. Long: Focuses on the behavior of fluids in fractured reservoirs, addressing proppant transport and its impact on reservoir performance.
  • "Reservoir Simulation" by Thomas J. R. Hughes: A detailed guide on reservoir simulation techniques, which can be used to model and predict proppant transport and the screening effect.

Articles

  • "Proppant Transport in Hydraulic Fracturing" by D. A. Clark and R. W. Zimmerman: A comprehensive review of proppant transport mechanisms and the factors influencing their behavior.
  • "The Screening Effect: A Review of its Causes, Consequences, and Mitigation Strategies" by J. D. Cleary: An in-depth analysis of the screening effect, covering its causes, impact on production, and available mitigation techniques.
  • "Experimental Investigation of Proppant Transport and Screen Effect in Hydraulic Fracturing" by M. A. Islam and S. A. Baroudi: Presents experimental results on proppant transport and the screening effect, offering insights into the phenomenon's dynamics.

Online Resources

  • SPE (Society of Petroleum Engineers) Website: A vast repository of technical papers, publications, and resources related to oil and gas production, including hydraulic fracturing and proppant transport.
  • "The Screening Effect" on Wikipedia: Provides a general overview of the screening effect, its causes, and its impact on hydraulic fracturing.
  • "Proppant Transport" on Schlumberger's website: Discusses proppant transport mechanisms, the challenges associated with proppant placement, and solutions to optimize proppant distribution.

Search Tips

  • "Screening effect hydraulic fracturing": This search will return relevant articles, research papers, and industry reports related to the screening effect in hydraulic fracturing.
  • "Proppant transport modeling": This search will bring up resources on simulating proppant movement in fractures, which can help understand the screening effect.
  • "Proppant additives for hydraulic fracturing": This search will reveal information about chemicals used to improve proppant suspension and mitigate the screening effect.

Techniques

Similar Terms
Drilling & Well CompletionCost Estimation & ControlAsset Integrity ManagementBudgeting & Financial ControlProject Planning & SchedulingIndustry LeadersReservoir EngineeringCivil & Structural EngineeringGeology & ExplorationHVAC & Ventilation SystemsGeneral Technical TermsRisk Management
Most Viewed
Categories

Comments


No Comments
POST COMMENT
captcha
Back