En génie électrique, les **grandeurs de base** sont des unités fondamentales utilisées comme point de référence pour analyser et comparer les systèmes électriques. Ces grandeurs constituent la base du **système en pourcentages**, un outil puissant pour simplifier les calculs et standardiser les données au sein des réseaux électriques.
Les grandeurs de base sont analogues au choix de l'échelle d'une règle. Elles établissent un standard pour mesurer différents paramètres électriques, tels que la tension, le courant, l'impédance et la puissance. Les grandeurs de base courantes incluent :
Le système en pourcentages exprime les grandeurs électriques en fractions de leurs valeurs de base correspondantes. Cette approche offre plusieurs avantages :
Considérez un système à 100 kV avec une tension de base de 100 kV. Une tension de 90 kV dans ce système serait exprimée comme 0,9 en pourcentages. Ceci est calculé en divisant la tension réelle (90 kV) par la tension de base (100 kV) :
Tension (en pourcentages) = Tension (réelle) / Tension (base) = 90 kV / 100 kV = 0,9
Le système en pourcentages trouve des applications extensives dans divers domaines du génie électrique, y compris :
La sélection de grandeurs de base appropriées est cruciale pour maximiser les avantages du système en pourcentages. Les facteurs à prendre en compte incluent :
Les grandeurs de base sont le fondement du système en pourcentages, un outil puissant en génie électrique. En comprenant le concept des grandeurs de base et leur rôle dans la définition du système en pourcentages, les ingénieurs peuvent simplifier les calculs, standardiser les données et obtenir des informations précieuses sur les systèmes électriques complexes. Le système en pourcentages reste un atout précieux pour analyser et concevoir des réseaux électriques efficaces et fiables.
Instructions: Choose the best answer for each question.
1. What is the primary purpose of base quantities in electrical engineering?
(a) To convert units of measurement. (b) To provide a reference point for analyzing electrical systems. (c) To simplify calculations related to power generation. (d) To standardize the design of electrical components.
(b) To provide a reference point for analyzing electrical systems.
2. Which of the following is NOT a common base quantity in electrical engineering?
(a) Base voltage (Vbase) (b) Base current (Ibase) (c) Base capacitance (Cbase) (d) Base power (Sbase)
(c) Base capacitance (Cbase)
3. What is the main advantage of using the per-unit system?
(a) It eliminates the need for complex mathematical formulas. (b) It simplifies calculations by working with relative values. (c) It allows for easy conversion between different units of measurement. (d) It ensures accurate results even with limited computational resources.
(b) It simplifies calculations by working with relative values.
4. A power system operates at a base voltage of 100 kV. What is the per-unit value of a voltage of 80 kV in this system?
(a) 0.8 (b) 1.25 (c) 80 (d) 100
(a) 0.8
5. In which of the following applications is the per-unit system NOT commonly used?
(a) Power system analysis (b) Generator and transformer design (c) Electrical circuit design (d) Protective relaying
(c) Electrical circuit design
Scenario: A 100 MVA, 13.8 kV power system has a base voltage of 13.8 kV and a base power of 100 MVA. Calculate the per-unit value of a 50 MVA load connected to the system.
Instructions:
1. **Base Current:** Ibase = Sbase / (√3 * Vbase) = (100 * 106 VA) / (√3 * 13.8 * 103 V) = 4184 A 2. **Actual Current:** Iactual = Sload / (√3 * Vsystem) = (50 * 106 VA) / (√3 * 13.8 * 103 V) = 2092 A 3. **Per-Unit Current:** Ipu = Iactual / Ibase = 2092 A / 4184 A = 0.5 pu Therefore, the per-unit value of the 50 MVA load is 0.5 pu.
This chapter details the practical techniques used to select and calculate base quantities for electrical power systems. The choice of base quantities significantly impacts the ease and accuracy of per-unit system calculations.
1.1 Selecting Base Power (Sbase):
The base power is often the starting point. Several strategies exist:
1.2 Deriving Base Voltage (Vbase):
Base voltage is typically selected based on the nominal voltage of the system's components.
1.3 Calculating Base Current (Ibase):
Once base power and base voltage are chosen, base current is derived using the apparent power formula:
I<sub>base</sub> = S<sub>base</sub> / (√3 * V<sub>base</sub>) (for three-phase systems)
I<sub>base</sub> = S<sub>base</sub> / V<sub>base</sub> (for single-phase systems)
This ensures consistent relationships between the base quantities.
1.4 Calculating Base Impedance (Zbase):
Base impedance is calculated to establish a reference for impedance values. This is crucial for accurately representing transformers and other impedance elements within the per-unit system:
Z<sub>base</sub> = V<sub>base</sub><sup>2</sup> / S<sub>base</sub>
This formula ensures that the per-unit values of impedance are directly related to the selected base power and voltage.
1.5 Considerations for Different System Configurations:
The selection of base quantities might require adjustments based on the system's configuration (e.g., delta or wye connected transformers, different phase arrangements). Careful attention must be paid to maintain consistency and accuracy in such cases. Appropriate formulas should be used to accurately reflect the system characteristics.
This chapter explores the different models used in conjunction with the per-unit system for analyzing electrical power systems. The accuracy and efficiency of the analysis heavily depend on the chosen model.
2.1 Single-Phase Equivalent Circuits:
For balanced three-phase systems, a single-phase equivalent circuit simplifies the analysis, reducing complexity and computational burden. This simplification is valid as long as the system remains balanced.
2.2 Two-Port Network Models:
Transformers and transmission lines are often modeled using two-port network representations (e.g., ABCD parameters). Converting these parameters to per-unit values simplifies cascade connections and system analysis.
2.3 Detailed Models (Including Shunt Elements):
More complex models incorporate shunt capacitances and conductances of transmission lines and other components. These elements, while often negligible for short lines, can become important for long-distance transmission analysis.
2.4 Simplified Models:
For preliminary analyses or specific aspects of the system, simplified models might suffice. For instance, neglecting certain elements like shunt capacitances can speed up calculations while maintaining reasonable accuracy.
2.5 Fault Models:
Specialized models exist for simulating various fault types (e.g., three-phase, single-line-to-ground). These models are crucial for protection system design and stability analysis and incorporate fault impedance in per-unit values.
2.6 Impact of Model Selection on Accuracy:
The selection of a model is a trade-off between accuracy and computational complexity. A detailed model provides higher accuracy but might require significantly more computational resources. The engineer must choose a model appropriate for the specific analysis and available resources.
This chapter discusses the various software tools available for simplifying and automating calculations related to the per-unit system.
3.1 Spreadsheet Software (Excel, Google Sheets):
Spreadsheets are useful for simple calculations and for organizing data in per-unit representation. However, their capabilities are limited for complex system analyses.
3.2 Specialized Power System Analysis Software (ETAP, PSS/E, PowerWorld Simulator):
These advanced software packages provide comprehensive tools for power system modeling, analysis (load flow, fault analysis, stability studies), and often incorporate per-unit calculations directly into their interfaces. They automate the process and offer capabilities far beyond simple spreadsheets.
3.3 Programming Languages (MATLAB, Python):
Using programming languages allows for greater flexibility and customization. Libraries like PyPower in Python offer functions for power system analysis, including per-unit calculations. This approach is particularly useful for research and advanced analyses.
3.4 Open-Source Tools:
Several open-source tools are available, providing free alternatives for some power system analysis tasks. These tools often have less advanced features compared to commercial software, but they are valuable for educational purposes and smaller-scale projects.
3.5 Choosing the Right Software:
The selection depends on the complexity of the system being analyzed, the specific analysis needs, and available resources (budget and expertise). Simple systems might be handled by spreadsheets, while large and complex systems require specialized software.
This chapter outlines best practices to ensure accurate and efficient use of the per-unit system in electrical engineering applications.
4.1 Consistent Base Quantities:
Maintaining consistent base quantities throughout the entire system is crucial. Using different base quantities in different parts of the system will lead to inconsistencies and errors in the analysis.
4.2 Proper Base Quantity Selection:
Carefully select base quantities based on the system characteristics and analysis goals. Inappropriate base quantities can result in unwieldy per-unit values, making calculations difficult to interpret.
4.3 Documentation:
Thoroughly document the chosen base quantities for future reference and collaboration. This ensures clarity and reproducibility of the analysis.
4.4 Verification and Validation:
Verify and validate the per-unit calculations using alternative methods or software to minimize errors. Cross-checking results increases the confidence in the analysis.
4.5 Understanding Limitations:
Recognize that the per-unit system is a simplification. Its accuracy depends on the validity of the underlying model and the appropriate choice of base quantities.
4.6 Handling Unbalanced Systems:
While the per-unit system simplifies analysis of balanced systems, specific techniques are required for dealing with unbalanced systems and incorporating the corresponding asymmetries. Symmetrical components are often used in these scenarios.
This chapter presents illustrative examples showcasing the application of base quantities and the per-unit system in various electrical engineering scenarios.
5.1 Case Study 1: Fault Analysis in a Power Transmission System:
A detailed example of using the per-unit system to analyze a three-phase fault on a transmission line. This would illustrate how per-unit values simplify fault current calculations and the selection of protective relay settings.
5.2 Case Study 2: Load Flow Analysis in a Distribution Network:
Demonstrates how the per-unit system streamlines load flow calculations in a distribution network with multiple transformers and varying voltage levels. The example would highlight the benefits of standardization and simplification.
5.3 Case Study 3: Generator Performance Analysis:
Illustrates how base quantities are used in determining the per-unit impedance of a generator and its impact on system stability. This case study emphasizes the use of per-unit values in determining generator performance characteristics.
5.4 Case Study 4: Transformer Modeling and Analysis:
A practical example of modeling a transformer (including its per-unit impedance) within a power system network and analyzing its impact on system voltage regulation and power flow. This would highlight the crucial role of per-unit representation in transformer analysis.
5.5 Case Study 5: Comparison of different Base Quantity Selections:
Illustrates how the choice of base quantities affects the resulting per-unit values and potentially the ease of analysis. This emphasizes the importance of careful selection and consistency in base quantity choices. It would show that, while different choices can be valid, some yield more manageable results.
Comments