Retour de flamme : Quand la foudre frappe en retour
Dans le monde de l'ingénierie électrique, le terme "retour de flamme" fait référence à un phénomène dangereux pouvant survenir lors d'une frappe de foudre. Ce n'est pas la foudre elle-même, mais plutôt un arc secondaire qui se forme le long d'une structure, généralement une tour de transmission, en raison d'une impédance élevée dans la tour ou son système de mise à la terre.
Imaginez que la foudre frappe une tour. L'électricité veut s'écouler vers le sol le plus rapidement possible. Cependant, si la tour ou son système de mise à la terre présente une impédance élevée (résistance à l'écoulement du courant électrique), le courant de foudre ne peut pas se rendre directement au sol. Au lieu de cela, il peut trouver un autre chemin - un chemin de moindre résistance.
C'est là qu'intervient le retour de flamme. Le courant de foudre peut remonter la tour, créant un arc secondaire, appelé retour de flamme. Cet arc peut se propager le long de la structure de la tour, causant potentiellement des dommages importants et constituant un danger sérieux pour le personnel et les équipements.
Pourquoi un retour de flamme se produit-il ?
Une impédance élevée peut résulter de divers facteurs :
- Mauvaise mise à la terre : La cause la plus fréquente de retour de flamme est une mise à la terre insuffisante de la tour. Si le système de mise à la terre présente une résistance élevée, le courant de foudre ne peut pas se dissiper suffisamment rapidement, ce qui entraîne un retour de flamme.
- Corrosion : Au fil du temps, la corrosion sur la structure de la tour ou les conducteurs de mise à la terre peut augmenter l'impédance, créant un chemin pour un retour de flamme.
- Conception de la tour : La conception de la tour elle-même peut influencer l'impédance. Certaines conceptions peuvent créer des points de concentration élevée pour le courant électrique, conduisant à un retour de flamme.
- Facteurs environnementaux : Des facteurs tels que les conditions du sol et l'humidité peuvent influencer l'efficacité du système de mise à la terre, contribuant à un retour de flamme.
Les dangers du retour de flamme
Le retour de flamme représente une menace sérieuse pour plusieurs raisons :
- Risque d'incendie : La chaleur intense générée par l'arc de retour de flamme peut facilement enflammer des matériaux inflammables près de la tour.
- Choc électrique : L'arc peut être extrêmement dangereux pour quiconque se trouve à proximité, provoquant potentiellement de graves brûlures ou même la mort.
- Dommages aux équipements : Le retour de flamme peut endommager la tour elle-même, ainsi que les équipements associés tels que les isolateurs, les transformateurs et les conducteurs.
Atténuation du retour de flamme
La prévention du retour de flamme nécessite une approche globale :
- Mise à la terre appropriée : Il est essentiel de garantir un système de mise à la terre à faible impédance. Cela inclut l'utilisation de conducteurs de mise à la terre épais et conducteurs et la garantie d'un bon contact entre les conducteurs et le sol.
- Inspections régulières : Inspecter régulièrement les tours et les systèmes de mise à la terre pour détecter la corrosion, les dommages ou tout autre facteur susceptible d'augmenter l'impédance.
- Conception de la tour : Envisager de concevoir des tours avec des caractéristiques qui minimisent le risque de retour de flamme, comme la minimisation des points à haute impédance et la garantie d'une bonne mise à la terre à tous les points de fixation.
- Systèmes de protection contre la foudre : La mise en œuvre de systèmes de protection contre la foudre tels que les parafoudres et les paratonnerres peut dévier le courant de foudre en toute sécurité vers le sol, réduisant ainsi le risque de retour de flamme.
En conclusion
Le retour de flamme est un danger sérieux qui peut survenir lors d'une frappe de foudre sur une tour. Il provient d'une impédance élevée dans la tour ou son système de mise à la terre, ce qui entraîne un arc secondaire qui se propage le long de la structure de la tour. Comprendre les causes et les dangers du retour de flamme est essentiel pour assurer la sécurité du personnel et des équipements. La mise en œuvre d'une mise à la terre adéquate, d'inspections régulières et de systèmes de protection contre la foudre peut atténuer considérablement le risque de retour de flamme, protégeant ainsi les vies et les infrastructures précieuses.
Test Your Knowledge
Backflash Quiz
Instructions: Choose the best answer for each question.
1. What is "backflash" in the context of lightning strikes? a) The initial lightning strike itself. b) A secondary arc that forms along a structure due to high impedance. c) The sound of thunder following a lightning strike. d) The visual flash of lightning.
Answer
b) A secondary arc that forms along a structure due to high impedance.
2. Which of the following is NOT a common cause of backflash? a) Poor grounding b) Corrosion c) Strong wind gusts d) Tower design
Answer
c) Strong wind gusts
3. What is the primary hazard posed by backflash? a) Damage to surrounding vegetation b) Radio interference c) Fire hazard, electrical shock, and equipment damage d) Reduced visibility
Answer
c) Fire hazard, electrical shock, and equipment damage
4. Which of the following is NOT a recommended strategy for mitigating backflash? a) Using thick, conductive grounding conductors b) Regular inspection of towers and grounding systems c) Using thicker insulators on the tower d) Implementing lightning protection systems
Answer
c) Using thicker insulators on the tower
5. Why is a low-impedance grounding system crucial in preventing backflash? a) It attracts lightning strikes to the tower. b) It helps to quickly dissipate the lightning current to the ground. c) It enhances the insulation properties of the tower. d) It reduces the electromagnetic interference caused by lightning.
Answer
b) It helps to quickly dissipate the lightning current to the ground.
Backflash Exercise
Scenario:
You are inspecting a transmission tower that has experienced a recent lightning strike. You notice some signs of damage on the tower structure and a section of the grounding system appears corroded.
Task:
Based on your knowledge of backflash, identify at least three potential problems that could have contributed to the backflash event. Explain how these problems could have led to a secondary arc forming along the tower.
Exercice Correction
Here are some potential problems that could have contributed to the backflash event:
- Corrosion on the grounding system: The corrosion on the grounding system would have increased the impedance, hindering the rapid flow of lightning current to the ground. This increased impedance could have forced the lightning current to find an alternative path, leading to a backflash along the tower structure.
- Damaged tower structure: The damage to the tower structure might have created a high-impedance point, forcing the lightning current to deviate from its intended path through the grounding system. This deviation could have triggered a backflash along the tower.
- Inadequate grounding conductor size: The grounding conductors might have been insufficiently thick or conductive, increasing resistance and contributing to the impedance problem. This, in turn, could have facilitated the formation of a backflash.
In summary, the combination of corrosion, potential damage to the tower structure, and possibly inadequate grounding conductor size likely created high impedance, leading to the lightning current seeking an alternative path and causing a backflash along the tower.
Books
- Electrical Power Systems Quality by H. L. Willis, J. D. McDonald, and T. E. McDermott - This book provides a comprehensive overview of power system quality, including chapters on lightning protection and grounding.
- Lightning Protection by R. H. Golde - A classic textbook that covers various aspects of lightning protection, including the phenomenon of backflash.
- Transmission Line Design Handbook by J. P. Reilly - This handbook discusses the design of transmission lines and includes sections on lightning protection and grounding.
Articles
- "Backflashover: A Critical Issue in Transmission Line Design" by IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery - A technical article that delves into the intricacies of backflash in transmission lines.
- "Lightning Protection of Power Systems" by Power Engineering Journal - This article discusses various aspects of lightning protection, including the role of grounding and backflash prevention.
- "The Importance of Grounding for Lightning Protection" by Electrical Safety Journal - This article highlights the critical role of effective grounding in mitigating backflash and ensuring electrical safety.
Online Resources
- IEEE Power & Energy Society (PES): This organization provides a vast collection of technical resources, including articles, standards, and guidelines related to electrical power systems and lightning protection.
- National Electrical Code (NEC): The NEC is an important reference for electrical safety regulations, including provisions for lightning protection and grounding.
- Power Engineering Magazine: This online magazine publishes articles on various aspects of the power industry, including those related to lightning protection and backflash.
Search Tips
- "Backflash in power systems": This search term will yield relevant articles and resources about backflash in electrical power systems.
- "Lightning protection grounding": This search term will provide information on grounding practices for lightning protection, which are essential for preventing backflash.
- "Backflashover transmission line": This more specific term will lead you to resources focused on backflash in transmission lines.
- "Lightning strike tower damage": This search term will help you find information on the damage caused by lightning strikes, including backflash.
Techniques
Backflash: A Comprehensive Overview
Chapter 1: Techniques for Backflash Mitigation
This chapter delves into the specific techniques employed to reduce the likelihood and severity of backflash events. Effective backflash mitigation relies on a multi-pronged approach targeting the root causes: high impedance in the grounding system and the tower structure itself.
1.1 Grounding Techniques:
- Low-Impedance Grounding: This is paramount. It involves using multiple grounding rods driven deep into the earth, interconnected with low-resistance conductors (e.g., copper). The use of grounding mats can also significantly enhance ground conductivity, especially in rocky or dry soil conditions.
- Grounding Rod Selection and Placement: The type of grounding rod (copper-clad steel, solid copper) and its depth of penetration are critical factors affecting the overall grounding resistance. Proper spacing of multiple rods is also essential for optimal performance.
- Grounding Conductor Sizing: Using appropriately sized conductors minimizes voltage drop and ensures efficient current dissipation. The conductor's material (e.g., copper, aluminum) and its cross-sectional area directly influence its resistance.
- Grounding System Testing: Regular testing with a ground resistance tester is essential to monitor the effectiveness of the grounding system. This ensures that impedance remains within acceptable limits.
- Counterpoise Grounding: For particularly challenging soil conditions, a counterpoise (a network of buried conductors) can significantly improve ground conductivity.
1.2 Structural Considerations:
- Tower Design Optimization: Tower design plays a role. Features that minimize points of high current concentration are desirable. This might involve using larger cross-sectional members or strategically placed conductors.
- Corrosion Prevention: Regular inspections and preventative measures, such as applying protective coatings or using corrosion-resistant materials, are crucial for maintaining low impedance.
- Bonding and Connection Quality: Ensuring clean, tight connections throughout the grounding system and tower structure is vital to minimize contact resistance. Poor connections are major contributors to high impedance.
1.3 Lightning Protection Systems:
- Lightning Rods and Air Terminals: These provide a preferential path for lightning current to reach the grounding system.
- Surge Arresters: These devices divert excessive current away from sensitive equipment, protecting it from the damaging effects of backflash.
- Shielding: Enclosing vulnerable equipment or areas within a conductive shield further minimizes the impact of backflash.
Chapter 2: Models for Backflash Prediction and Analysis
Accurately predicting the occurrence of backflash is challenging, but several models are used to assess the risk. These models incorporate various factors influencing impedance and current flow.
2.1 Electromagnetic Modeling: Sophisticated software packages employ finite element analysis (FEA) and other numerical techniques to simulate lightning strikes and current flow within a tower structure and its grounding system. These models provide detailed information about voltage gradients and potential backflash paths.
2.2 Empirical Models: Simpler, empirical models often use statistical data and historical lightning strike information to estimate the probability of backflash events based on factors like tower height, grounding resistance, and soil conductivity. These models are useful for quick risk assessments but are less accurate than electromagnetic models.
2.3 Statistical Models: These models analyze historical data of lightning strikes and backflash incidents to identify patterns and predict the likelihood of future occurrences based on relevant parameters.
Chapter 3: Software for Backflash Analysis and Design
Several specialized software packages aid in the design, analysis, and mitigation of backflash. These tools offer various functionalities:
- Electromagnetic field simulation software: This software performs complex calculations to model lightning strikes and current distribution within structures. Examples include COMSOL Multiphysics, ANSYS Maxwell, and LSP-ICE.
- Grounding system design software: Software specific to grounding design aids in the selection of grounding rods, conductors, and optimal layout for minimizing ground impedance.
- Lightning protection design software: Tools designed for designing comprehensive lightning protection systems can help engineers plan the placement of lightning rods, surge arresters, and other protective components.
Chapter 4: Best Practices for Backflash Prevention
Effective backflash prevention involves a holistic approach encompassing design, construction, maintenance, and regular inspections.
4.1 Design Phase: Thorough planning and design are crucial. This includes: * Selecting appropriate materials and dimensions for tower construction and grounding systems. * Optimizing tower design to minimize high-impedance points. * Incorporating surge arresters and other lightning protection devices during the initial design stage.
4.2 Construction Phase: * Ensuring meticulous adherence to design specifications during construction. * Using qualified personnel for all aspects of the grounding system installation. * Performing quality checks at each stage of the construction process.
4.3 Maintenance and Inspection: * Regular inspections to detect corrosion, damage, and loose connections. * Implementing a preventative maintenance program to address identified issues promptly. * Testing the grounding system at specified intervals to verify low impedance.
Chapter 5: Case Studies of Backflash Incidents and Mitigation Strategies
This chapter presents real-world examples of backflash events and the successful (and unsuccessful) mitigation strategies implemented. Analyzing these case studies provides valuable insights into the practical challenges and effective solutions for backflash prevention. Examples could include:
- Case study 1: A transmission tower experiencing backflash due to corrosion in the grounding system and the subsequent remediation efforts.
- Case study 2: A substation where backflash caused significant equipment damage and the measures taken to prevent recurrence.
- Case study 3: A comparison of two similar structures, one with a properly designed grounding system and the other with insufficient grounding, showing the vastly different outcomes.
These case studies will highlight the importance of proactive measures and the long-term cost-effectiveness of investing in proper lightning protection and grounding systems.
Comments