What is Product Acceptance Review used in Functional Testing?
Asked 3 months, 2 weeks ago | Viewed 78times
0

What specific criteria and methodologies are employed during a Product Acceptance Review (PAR) within the context of Functional Testing, and how does the PAR process differ depending on the type of software being tested (e.g., web application, mobile app, enterprise software)?

This question digs deeper than a simple definition of PAR. It explores:

  • Criteria: What specific aspects are evaluated during a PAR? This goes beyond general acceptance criteria and delves into functional specifications, user stories, and other relevant documentation used as reference points.
  • Methodologies: How is the PAR conducted? Are there specific templates, checklists, or frameworks used to ensure a thorough and standardized review?
  • Type of Software: The question acknowledges that PAR procedures might vary depending on the complexity and purpose of the software being tested. This invites a comparison of PAR approaches for web applications, mobile apps, and enterprise software, highlighting differences in focus and emphasis.

This detailed question encourages a nuanced and comprehensive answer that goes beyond a basic definition and dives into the practical aspects of PAR within the context of Functional Testing.

comment question
1 Answer(s)
0

Product Acceptance Review (PAR) in Functional Testing

A Product Acceptance Review (PAR) is a formal process conducted at the end of functional testing to determine if the software product meets the agreed-upon requirements and is ready for release. This review is conducted by the end user or client, and its main purpose is to ensure the software is usable, reliable, and meets their specific needs.

Here's how PAR fits into functional testing:

  1. Functional Testing: This phase focuses on verifying that the software meets all the specified functionalities outlined in the requirements document. Test cases are designed to cover each feature and its various scenarios.
  2. PAR: Once functional testing is completed, the software is presented to the end users or clients for a final review. The PAR team rigorously evaluates the software based on:
    • Functionality: Does the software perform all the intended actions as per the requirements?
    • Usability: Is the software easy to use and understand for the target audience?
    • Performance: Does the software meet the expected performance standards in terms of speed, responsiveness, and resource consumption?
    • Security: Are the data and the software secure from unauthorized access and threats?
    • Documentation: Are all the necessary user manuals and documentation available and comprehensive?
  3. Acceptance: The PAR team either accepts the software for release or identifies any outstanding issues that need to be addressed before release.

Key elements of a successful PAR:

  • Clear acceptance criteria: These should be defined upfront and agreed upon by all stakeholders.
  • Detailed test plan: This plan outlines the specific scenarios and tests that will be performed during the PAR.
  • Effective communication: Open communication between the development team and the PAR team is crucial for resolving issues and ensuring a smooth review process.
  • Formal documentation: The results of the PAR should be documented, including any defects or issues found, and their resolution status.

Benefits of PAR:

  • Ensures user satisfaction: The software meets the specific needs and expectations of the end users.
  • Reduces risk of defects: By identifying issues early on, PAR minimizes the chances of releasing a defective product.
  • Improves communication: The review process fosters communication between different teams involved in the development process.
  • Increases confidence in the product: A successful PAR builds trust in the product's quality and reliability.

In essence, the PAR acts as the final quality gate before a software product is released to the market. It plays a crucial role in ensuring that the software meets the users' needs and is ready for deployment.

comment Answer

Top viewed

How to calculate piping diameter and thikness according to ASME B31.3 Process Piping Design ?
What is the scientific classification of an atom?
What is Conductivity (fracture flow) used in Reservoir Engineering?
How to use Monte Carlo similation using python to similate Project Risks?
What is a neutron?

Tags Cloud

neutron electron proton atome three-phase electrical 220V Conductivity flow fracture reservoir Commitment Agreement planning Technical Guide scheduling bailer drilling Storage Quality Control QA/QC Regulatory Audit Compliance Drilling Completion logging Heading Well Offsite Fabrication Éthique Probabilité erreur intégrité Gestion actifs indexation Outil Zinc Sulfide/Sulfate Gas Oil Triple Project Planning Task Scheduling Force RWO PDP annulus Hydrophobic General Plan Testing Functional Test Density Mobilize Subcontract Penetration Digital Simulation tubular Processing goods Sponsor Network Path, Racking ("LSD") Start Medium Microorganisms Backward Engineering Reservoir V-door Water Brackish pumping Scheduled ("SSD") Safety Drill Valve Status Schedule Resource Level Chart Gantt Training Formaldehyde Awareness elevators Estimation Control Pre-Tender Estimate Current budget (QA/QC) Quality Assurance Inspection In-Process Concession (subsea) Plateau Impeller retriever Appraisal Activity (processing) Neutralization Source Potential Personal Rewards Ground Packing Element Liner Slotted Conformance Hanger Instrument Production (injector) Tracer Facilities (mud) Pressure Lift-Off Communication Nonverbal Carrier Concurrent Delays slick Valuation Leaders Manpower Industry Risks Management Incident Spending Investigation Limit Reporting test) (well Identification Phase Programme Vapor World Threshold Velocity lift) Particle Benefits Compressor Painting Insulation Float ("FF") Statistics element Temperature Detailed Motivating Policy Manual Emergency Requirements Response Specific ("KPI") Terms Performance Indicators Qualifications Contractor Optimistic Discontinuous Barite Clintoptolite Dispute Fines Migration Pitot Materials Procurement Evaluation Vendor Contract Award Assets Computer Modeling Procedures Configuration Verification Leader Phased clamp safety (facilities) Considerations Organization Development Competency Trade-off Tetrad Off-the-Shelf Items hazard consequence probability project Python Monte-Carlo risks simulation visualize analyze pipeline ferrites black-powder SRBC Baseline Risk tubing Diameter coiled Emulsifier Emulsion Invert Responsibility Casing Electrical Submersible Phasing Finish Known-Unknown Curvature (seismic) Pre-Qualifications Exchange Capacity Cation MIT-IA Depth Vertical Pulse Triplex Brainstorming Log-Inject-Log Managed GERT Nipple Cased Perforated Fault Software Staff System Vibroseis radioactivity Product Review Acceptance Capability Immature Net-Back Lapse Factor Specification Culture Matrix Staffing Effort Cement Micro Letter Fanning Equation factor) friction ECC WIMS Bar-Vent perforating meter displacement FLC Information Flow connection Junk Static service In-House OWC BATNA Curve Bridging depth control perforation Doghouse Scope Description D&A E&A Effect Belt Architecture wet DFIT Magnitude Order LPG Contractual Legal Electric Logging CL Drawing Logic Semi-Time-Scaled IAxOA CMIT Expenditures Actual opening Skirt access (corrosion) Passivation Blanking Performing Uplift Underbalance Communicating Groups SDV Fluid Shoot Qualification Spacing Hydrofluoric Shearing basket Construction Systems Programmer Individual Activation Layout organophosphates Deox Fourier A2/O botanical pesticide EAP colloidal Displacement process GPR Relationship SOC Constraint Prime Gathering Tap CM Subproject Oil-In-Place Percentage time-lag accumulator compounds aliphatic vapor evaporation compression echo فنى # psvs

Tags

-->-->
Back