Function Points

Function Points: A Powerful Tool for Software Sizing and Estimation

In the world of software development, accurate estimation and sizing are crucial for project planning, resource allocation, and cost control. While lines of code (LOC) are often used as a metric, they can be misleading, particularly in complex applications. This is where Function Points (FP) come in – a powerful and versatile technique for measuring software functionality.

What are Function Points?

Function Points are a measure of the functional size of a software application. Unlike LOC, which focuses on the physical code, FP considers the functional complexity of the system. It takes into account the various inputs, outputs, files, and interfaces that users interact with, providing a more holistic and meaningful representation of software scope.

Components of Function Point Analysis:

Function Point analysis involves identifying and quantifying five key components:

External Inputs (EI): Data that the system receives from external sources.
External Outputs (EO): Data that the system produces for external users.
External Inquiries (EQ): Requests for data from the system, resulting in a response.
Internal Logical Files (ILF): Data stored internally by the system.
External Interface Files (EIF): Files used for communication with other systems.

Benefits of Using Function Points:

Accurate Cost Estimation: FP provides a reliable basis for estimating development costs, allowing for better budgeting and resource allocation.
Effective Project Sizing: FP helps to define the true scope of a project, enabling accurate planning and scheduling.
Maintenance Effort Estimation: FP can be used to estimate the effort required for maintaining and enhancing the software, promoting better long-term cost management.
Objective Comparison: FP provides a common language for comparing the size and complexity of different software projects.
Improved Communication: FP facilitates clear communication between developers, managers, and stakeholders about project scope and expectations.

The Process of Function Point Analysis:

Identify Functional Components: Identify all the key functional components of the system, focusing on user interactions.
Classify Each Component: Categorize each component based on the five elements (EI, EO, EQ, ILF, EIF).
Determine Complexity: Assign a complexity rating to each component based on factors like data volume, number of calculations, and data relationships.
Calculate Function Points: Apply predefined formulas to calculate the total Function Points based on complexity and component count.

Conclusion:

Function Points are a valuable tool for software sizing and estimation, offering a more comprehensive and accurate representation of software complexity than traditional LOC measures. By providing a standardized approach, FP empowers project teams to effectively plan, manage, and track their software development efforts.

Test Your Knowledge

Function Points Quiz

Instructions: Choose the best answer for each question.

1. What is the primary advantage of using Function Points over Lines of Code (LOC) for software sizing?

a) Function Points are easier to calculate. b) Function Points consider only the physical code size. c) Function Points measure the functional complexity of the system. d) Function Points are more suitable for small-scale projects.

Answer

c) Function Points measure the functional complexity of the system.

2. Which of the following is NOT a component of Function Point analysis?

a) External Inputs (EI) b) External Outputs (EO) c) Internal Data Structures (IDS) d) External Interface Files (EIF)

Answer

c) Internal Data Structures (IDS)

3. What is the main purpose of determining the complexity of each Function Point component?

a) To simplify the calculation process. b) To identify potential design flaws. c) To accurately reflect the effort required for implementation. d) To compare the size of different software systems.

Answer

c) To accurately reflect the effort required for implementation.

4. Which of the following is NOT a benefit of using Function Points for software estimation?

a) Improved communication between stakeholders. b) Accurate cost estimation and resource allocation. c) Easier project management for waterfall methodologies. d) Objective comparison of software project sizes.

Answer

c) Easier project management for waterfall methodologies.

5. What is the final step in the Function Point analysis process?

a) Identifying functional components. b) Classifying components based on their type. c) Determining complexity of each component. d) Calculating the total Function Points using predefined formulas.

Answer

d) Calculating the total Function Points using predefined formulas.

Function Points Exercise

Scenario:

You are tasked with estimating the size of a new online banking application using Function Points. The application has the following features:

Customer login: Users can log in with their username and password.
Account balance inquiry: Users can view their account balances.
Transaction history: Users can view a detailed history of their transactions.
Transfer funds: Users can transfer funds between their own accounts.
Bill payment: Users can pay bills directly from their accounts.

Instructions:

Identify the functional components of the application and categorize them based on the five Function Point elements (EI, EO, EQ, ILF, EIF).
Determine a complexity rating for each component (simple, average, complex).
Calculate the total Function Points based on the complexity and component count.

Exercice Correction

Here's a possible breakdown of the Function Points for the online banking application:

Component	Type	Complexity
Customer login	External Input (EI)	Average
Account balance inquiry	External Output (EO)	Average
Transaction history	External Output (EO)	Complex
Transfer funds	External Input (EI)	Complex
Bill payment	External Input (EI)	Complex
Customer account data	Internal Logical File (ILF)	Complex
Transaction data	Internal Logical File (ILF)	Complex

**Calculating Function Points:**

To calculate the total Function Points, you would need to apply specific formulas based on the complexity and count of each component. The exact formulas vary depending on the Function Point counting method used. However, a simplified approach would involve assigning weights to each complexity level (e.g., simple = 3, average = 4, complex = 5) and multiplying those weights by the number of components.

For example, in this scenario, the total Function Points could be calculated as follows:

Total Function Points = (3 x 1) + (4 x 1) + (5 x 1) + (5 x 1) + (5 x 1) + (5 x 1) + (5 x 1) = **37 Function Points**

Note: This is a simplified calculation and the actual Function Point count may vary depending on the specific methodology and complexity weights used.

Books

Function Point Analysis: A Practical Guide by Capers Jones: A comprehensive guide to Function Points, covering its history, methodology, and applications.
Software Measurement: A Practical Guide to Understanding, Defining, and Using Software Metrics by David Galin: Explores various software metrics, including Function Points, and their applications in software development.
Effective Software Measurement: A Practical Guide to Software Measurement by Robert Grady and Deborah Caswell: Focuses on applying software measurement techniques, including Function Points, to improve software quality and productivity.

Articles

Function Points: A Powerful Tool for Software Sizing and Estimation by [Your Name]: This article provides a good overview of Function Points and their advantages.
Function Points: A Guide for Estimating Software Development Effort by the International Function Point Users Group (IFPUG): A detailed explanation of the Function Point methodology and its application in software development.
Function Point Analysis: A Case Study by [Author Name]: A case study illustrating the practical application of Function Points in a specific software project.

Online Resources

International Function Point Users Group (IFPUG): The official website of the IFPUG, providing comprehensive resources on Function Points, including standards, training materials, and certification information.
Function Point Analysis (Wikipedia): A general overview of Function Points with links to relevant resources and further information.
Function Points: A Guide for Beginners (Article): A beginner-friendly introduction to Function Points, explaining the basic concepts and how they are used.

Search Tips

"Function Point Analysis" + "best practices": To find articles and resources on best practices for implementing Function Points.
"Function Point Analysis" + "case study": To find case studies illustrating the application of Function Points in different software projects.
"Function Point Analysis" + "training": To find training courses and certifications related to Function Point analysis.

Techniques

Chapter 1: Techniques

Function Point Analysis: A Detailed Look at the Techniques

Function Point analysis involves a structured approach to measuring software functionality. This chapter delves deeper into the specific techniques used to calculate Function Points.

1.1 Counting Techniques:

Unweighted Function Points (UFP): This technique focuses on simply counting the number of functional components without considering their complexity. Each instance of EI, EO, EQ, ILF, and EIF is given a weight of 1.
Weighted Function Points (WFP): This technique accounts for the complexity of each component by assigning weights based on specific factors. The complexity levels are often categorized as low, average, and high, with corresponding weights.

1.2 Function Point Value (FPV):

FPV = Count x Complexity Weight
This formula is applied to each component type, resulting in a weighted count for each EI, EO, EQ, ILF, and EIF.
The total FPV is the sum of the individual component FPVs.

1.3 Value Adjustment Factor (VAF):

The VAF accounts for factors like data communication, distributed processing, performance, and security.
These factors are assigned a rating based on their impact on the overall system complexity.
The VAF is a multiplier that adjusts the total FPV to account for the added complexity.

1.4 Calculation Formula:

Function Points (FP) = (FPV x VAF) / 100
This formula provides the final Function Point value, which represents the software's functional size and complexity.

1.5 Different Function Point Counting Standards:

IFPUG (International Function Point Users Group): This is the most widely recognized standard for Function Point counting.
COSMIC (Counting and Sizing Method for Information Systems): Another popular standard, often used in Europe.
NESMA (National Estimating Standards for Software Maintenance and Applications): Focuses on maintenance and application sizing.

1.6 Advantages of Different Techniques:

UFP: Simple and quick for initial estimates, but less accurate for complex systems.
WFP: Provides a more refined estimate by considering complexity, but requires more detailed analysis.
VAF: Accounts for external factors that impact complexity, leading to a more accurate representation.

1.7 Conclusion:

By understanding these techniques, software teams can choose the most appropriate method for their specific needs, ensuring accurate and reliable function point calculations. This information forms the foundation for accurate software sizing and estimation, leading to better project management and decision-making.

Similar Terms

Drilling & Well Completion