Reservoir Engineering

tertiary recovery

Tertiary Recovery: Pushing the Limits of Oil Extraction

Oil and gas production is a complex process that involves extracting these valuable resources from underground reservoirs. While initial extraction, known as primary recovery, relies on natural pressure to drive oil to the surface, it often leaves behind a significant portion of the reservoir's oil. This is where secondary and tertiary recovery methods come into play, aiming to maximize oil production and leave minimal resources untapped.

Primary Recovery: The Natural Flow

Primary recovery utilizes the natural pressure present within the reservoir to force oil towards production wells. This method is the simplest and least expensive, but its effectiveness dwindles as pressure declines. Often, only around 10-15% of the reservoir's oil is extracted through this method.

Secondary Recovery: Boosting Production

Once natural pressure subsides, secondary recovery methods step in to maintain production. These methods involve injecting fluids into the reservoir to maintain pressure and improve oil displacement. Common techniques include:

  • Waterflooding: Injecting water into the reservoir to push the oil towards the production wells.
  • Gas injection: Injecting gas (often natural gas) to increase reservoir pressure and displace oil.
  • Polymer flooding: Injecting polymers to enhance water viscosity, improving sweep efficiency and oil recovery.

Secondary recovery typically recovers an additional 10-20% of the reservoir's oil, significantly increasing overall production compared to primary recovery.

Tertiary Recovery: Reaching the Unreachable

Tertiary recovery methods are deployed after the effectiveness of both primary and secondary recovery diminishes. These methods target the remaining oil trapped in the reservoir, often in complex geological formations or as viscous oil. Tertiary recovery techniques are typically more expensive and complex than their predecessors, but they offer the potential for significant additional oil recovery.

Tertiary Recovery Methods:

  • Thermal Recovery: Injecting heat into the reservoir to reduce oil viscosity and improve flow.
  • Chemical Recovery: Injecting chemicals to alter the properties of the oil or reservoir rock, making it easier to extract.
  • Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery (MEOR): Utilizing microorganisms to break down heavy oil components and enhance oil mobility.
  • CO2 Flooding: Injecting CO2 into the reservoir, which dissolves in the oil, reducing its viscosity and enhancing recovery.

Tertiary recovery not only restores formation pressure but also improves oil displacement or fluid flow in the reservoir. It aims to "squeeze" out the last remaining oil by:

  • Improving reservoir properties: Reducing oil viscosity, increasing porosity, or altering interfacial tension between oil and water.
  • Modifying the flow patterns: Encouraging oil to flow towards production wells by altering the direction and speed of fluids.

Comparison Summary:

| Recovery Method | Description | Recovery Efficiency | Complexity & Cost | |---|---|---|---| | Primary | Utilizes natural pressure | 10-15% | Simple and Low | | Secondary | Injects fluids to maintain pressure | 10-20% | Moderate complexity and cost | | Tertiary | Employs advanced techniques to extract residual oil | Variable, depending on the method | High complexity and cost |

Conclusion:

Tertiary recovery plays a critical role in maximizing oil production, ensuring that valuable resources are not left untouched. While it comes with higher costs and technical challenges, its potential to unlock substantial reserves makes it an essential component of a sustainable oil and gas industry. As technology advances, further innovations in tertiary recovery methods will continue to push the boundaries of oil production, extending the lifespan of existing reservoirs and contributing to global energy security.


Test Your Knowledge

Tertiary Recovery Quiz

Instructions: Choose the best answer for each question.

1. Which of the following statements BEST describes the main goal of tertiary recovery methods? a) To increase the initial production rate of a reservoir. b) To extract oil that remains after primary and secondary recovery methods. c) To reduce the amount of water injected into a reservoir during secondary recovery. d) To prevent the formation of gas bubbles in the oil during extraction.

Answer

b) To extract oil that remains after primary and secondary recovery methods.

2. Which of these tertiary recovery methods utilizes microorganisms to enhance oil recovery? a) Thermal recovery b) Chemical recovery c) Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery (MEOR) d) CO2 flooding

Answer

c) Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery (MEOR)

3. What is the primary reason why tertiary recovery methods are generally more complex and expensive than primary and secondary recovery methods? a) They involve using more powerful pumps to extract oil. b) They require drilling deeper wells into the reservoir. c) They utilize advanced technologies and techniques to target remaining oil. d) They require more workers to operate the equipment.

Answer

c) They utilize advanced technologies and techniques to target remaining oil.

4. Which of the following is NOT a common method used in tertiary recovery to enhance oil extraction? a) Injecting heat to reduce oil viscosity b) Injecting chemicals to alter oil properties c) Injecting water to maintain reservoir pressure d) Injecting CO2 to dissolve in oil and reduce its viscosity

Answer

c) Injecting water to maintain reservoir pressure

5. Which of the following is a primary benefit of using tertiary recovery methods? a) It helps reduce greenhouse gas emissions from oil production. b) It increases the lifespan of existing oil reservoirs. c) It improves the quality of extracted oil. d) It reduces the cost of oil production.

Answer

b) It increases the lifespan of existing oil reservoirs.

Tertiary Recovery Exercise

Scenario: You are an engineer working for an oil and gas company. Your team is exploring the use of tertiary recovery methods for a mature oil field that has seen a significant decline in production after primary and secondary recovery methods were exhausted.

Task:

  1. Research and identify two different tertiary recovery methods that could be suitable for this mature oil field.
  2. Explain the potential benefits and drawbacks of each method considering the specific characteristics of the oil field (e.g., oil viscosity, reservoir geology, environmental concerns).
  3. Based on your analysis, recommend which tertiary recovery method would be most suitable for this oil field and justify your recommendation.

Exercice Correction

This exercise requires research and specific information about the oil field, so there isn't one single "correct" answer. However, here's an example of how a student might approach this exercise:

**1. Identify two tertiary recovery methods:**

  • **Thermal Recovery (Steam Injection):** This could be suitable if the oil is very viscous, and the reservoir geology allows for steam injection. It's generally effective in increasing oil mobility and recovery.
  • **CO2 Flooding:** This method might be suitable if the oil field has a relatively low permeability and the reservoir is not too deep. CO2 can dissolve in the oil, reducing viscosity and enhancing recovery.

**2. Benefits and drawbacks of each method:**

  • **Steam Injection:** * **Benefits:** Reduces oil viscosity, improves mobility, good for heavy oil reservoirs. * **Drawbacks:** High energy consumption, potential for steam channeling, environmental concerns (water usage, potential for steam leaks).
  • **CO2 Flooding:** * **Benefits:** Reduces viscosity, relatively low energy consumption, potential for carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. * **Drawbacks:** Can be challenging for deep reservoirs, CO2 injection requires infrastructure, potential for leakage and environmental impact if not managed properly.

**3. Recommendation:**

The student would then need to weigh the benefits and drawbacks of each method based on the specific characteristics of the oil field. For example, if the reservoir is shallow and permeability is low, CO2 flooding might be more suitable. If the oil is very viscous and the reservoir is deep, steam injection might be a better option. They should also consider factors like environmental regulations and the availability of resources for each method.

This exercise encourages students to apply their understanding of tertiary recovery methods to a real-world scenario, demonstrating their ability to analyze information and make informed recommendations.


Books

  • Enhanced Oil Recovery: by D.W. Green and G.P. Willhite (2006) - Provides a comprehensive overview of EOR methods, including tertiary recovery.
  • Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil Recovery: by M.J. Economides and K.G. Nolte (2000) - Focuses on the basic principles and applications of EOR techniques.
  • Petroleum Engineering: Production Operations: by T.D. O'Dell (2013) - Offers a detailed explanation of production operations, including tertiary recovery methods.

Articles

  • "Tertiary Recovery: Pushing the Limits of Oil Extraction" by [Your Name] (This article you provided!) - This article provides a good introduction to the topic.
  • "Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery: A Review of Technologies and Applications" by J.G. Chang et al. (2016) - Examines the potential of MEOR for tertiary recovery.
  • "CO2 Flooding: A Review of the Technology and its Application" by M.A. Celia et al. (2005) - Discusses the principles and challenges of CO2 flooding for enhanced oil recovery.
  • "Thermal Recovery Methods for Heavy Oil and Bitumen: A Review" by T.A. Shook (2014) - Focuses on various thermal recovery methods for viscous oil.

Online Resources

  • SPE (Society of Petroleum Engineers): https://www.spe.org/ - Offers a vast repository of technical resources, including publications, presentations, and events related to EOR.
  • Energy Information Administration (EIA): https://www.eia.gov/ - Provides data and analysis on oil and gas production, including information on EOR technologies.
  • Schlumberger: https://www.slb.com/ - This oilfield services company has a dedicated section on EOR technologies, offering insights and case studies.

Search Tips

  • Use specific keywords: "tertiary oil recovery," "EOR," "thermal recovery," "chemical EOR," "CO2 flooding," "microbial EOR."
  • Combine keywords with relevant terms: "tertiary recovery methods," "tertiary recovery challenges," "tertiary recovery case studies," "tertiary recovery economics."
  • Use quotation marks: Enclose specific phrases in quotation marks for precise searches. For example: "CO2 flooding for enhanced oil recovery."
  • Use site: operator: Limit your search to specific websites. For example: "site:spe.org tertiary oil recovery."
  • Filter your results: Use advanced search filters by date, file type, and other criteria to refine your search.

Techniques

Tertiary Recovery: Pushing the Limits of Oil Extraction

Oil and gas production is a complex process that involves extracting these valuable resources from underground reservoirs. While initial extraction, known as primary recovery, relies on natural pressure to drive oil to the surface, it often leaves behind a significant portion of the reservoir's oil. This is where secondary and tertiary recovery methods come into play, aiming to maximize oil production and leave minimal resources untapped.

Primary Recovery: The Natural Flow

Primary recovery utilizes the natural pressure present within the reservoir to force oil towards production wells. This method is the simplest and least expensive, but its effectiveness dwindles as pressure declines. Often, only around 10-15% of the reservoir's oil is extracted through this method.

Secondary Recovery: Boosting Production

Once natural pressure subsides, secondary recovery methods step in to maintain production. These methods involve injecting fluids into the reservoir to maintain pressure and improve oil displacement. Common techniques include:

  • Waterflooding: Injecting water into the reservoir to push the oil towards the production wells.
  • Gas injection: Injecting gas (often natural gas) to increase reservoir pressure and displace oil.
  • Polymer flooding: Injecting polymers to enhance water viscosity, improving sweep efficiency and oil recovery.

Secondary recovery typically recovers an additional 10-20% of the reservoir's oil, significantly increasing overall production compared to primary recovery.

Tertiary Recovery: Reaching the Unreachable

Tertiary recovery methods are deployed after the effectiveness of both primary and secondary recovery diminishes. These methods target the remaining oil trapped in the reservoir, often in complex geological formations or as viscous oil. Tertiary recovery techniques are typically more expensive and complex than their predecessors, but they offer the potential for significant additional oil recovery.

Tertiary Recovery Methods:

  • Thermal Recovery: Injecting heat into the reservoir to reduce oil viscosity and improve flow.
  • Chemical Recovery: Injecting chemicals to alter the properties of the oil or reservoir rock, making it easier to extract.
  • Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery (MEOR): Utilizing microorganisms to break down heavy oil components and enhance oil mobility.
  • CO2 Flooding: Injecting CO2 into the reservoir, which dissolves in the oil, reducing its viscosity and enhancing recovery.

Tertiary recovery not only restores formation pressure but also improves oil displacement or fluid flow in the reservoir. It aims to "squeeze" out the last remaining oil by:

  • Improving reservoir properties: Reducing oil viscosity, increasing porosity, or altering interfacial tension between oil and water.
  • Modifying the flow patterns: Encouraging oil to flow towards production wells by altering the direction and speed of fluids.

Comparison Summary:

| Recovery Method | Description | Recovery Efficiency | Complexity & Cost | |---|---|---|---| | Primary | Utilizes natural pressure | 10-15% | Simple and Low | | Secondary | Injects fluids to maintain pressure | 10-20% | Moderate complexity and cost | | Tertiary | Employs advanced techniques to extract residual oil | Variable, depending on the method | High complexity and cost |

Conclusion:

Tertiary recovery plays a critical role in maximizing oil production, ensuring that valuable resources are not left untouched. While it comes with higher costs and technical challenges, its potential to unlock substantial reserves makes it an essential component of a sustainable oil and gas industry. As technology advances, further innovations in tertiary recovery methods will continue to push the boundaries of oil production, extending the lifespan of existing reservoirs and contributing to global energy security.

Chapter 1: Techniques of Tertiary Recovery

Tertiary recovery employs a range of advanced techniques to enhance oil extraction. These techniques can be broadly categorized as thermal, chemical, and microbial methods, each targeting specific aspects of the reservoir and oil properties.

1. Thermal Recovery: This method involves injecting heat into the reservoir to reduce the viscosity of the oil, making it flow more easily towards production wells. Techniques include:

  • Steam Injection: Injecting high-pressure steam into the reservoir to heat the oil. This is particularly effective in heavy oil reservoirs.
  • Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS): A variation of steam injection where steam is injected in cycles, allowing for heat soaking and oil mobilization.
  • In-situ Combustion: Igniting a portion of the oil in the reservoir to generate heat and drive the remaining oil towards the wells. This method is complex and requires careful control to prevent uncontrolled burning.
  • Hot Water Injection: Injecting heated water to lower oil viscosity. Less effective than steam injection but can be more cost-effective in some cases.

2. Chemical Recovery: This approach focuses on altering the physical and chemical properties of the oil or reservoir rock to improve oil recovery. Techniques include:

  • Polymer Flooding: Injecting polymers to increase the viscosity of the injected water, improving sweep efficiency and displacing more oil.
  • Surfactant Flooding: Injecting surfactants to reduce the interfacial tension between oil and water, allowing oil to detach from the rock and flow more easily.
  • Alkaline Flooding: Injecting alkaline solutions to alter the wettability of the reservoir rock, making it more oil-wet and improving oil displacement.
  • ASP Flooding: A combination of alkaline, surfactant, and polymer flooding to maximize oil recovery.

3. Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery (MEOR): This innovative technique leverages the metabolic activities of microorganisms to enhance oil recovery. Microorganisms can:

  • Reduce oil viscosity: By consuming certain oil components.
  • Improve reservoir permeability: By producing gases or acids that alter the rock structure.
  • Enhance waterflood sweep efficiency: By creating pathways for water to reach previously inaccessible oil.

4. CO2 Flooding: Injecting supercritical CO2 into the reservoir has several positive effects, including:

  • Viscosity reduction: CO2 dissolves in the oil, significantly lowering its viscosity.
  • Improved miscibility: The CO2 can mix with the oil, further enhancing the displacement process.
  • Potential for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): CO2 injection can contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Chapter 2: Models for Tertiary Recovery Optimization

Accurate reservoir modeling is crucial for successful tertiary recovery projects. These models help predict the effectiveness of different techniques and optimize injection strategies. Several types of models are employed:

1. Reservoir Simulation Models: These are complex numerical models that simulate the fluid flow, heat transfer, and chemical reactions within the reservoir. They consider factors like reservoir geometry, rock properties, fluid properties, and injection parameters. Common software packages include CMG, Eclipse, and STARS. These models predict oil recovery based on various injection strategies and help optimize the design of tertiary recovery projects.

2. Analytical Models: Simpler models that offer quicker results but with less detail than reservoir simulations. These are useful for initial assessments and screening various scenarios. They often utilize simplified assumptions about reservoir geometry and fluid properties.

3. Statistical Models: Data-driven models that utilize historical production data and reservoir characteristics to predict future performance and optimize injection parameters. Machine learning techniques are increasingly being incorporated into these models to improve their predictive capability.

4. Geomechanical Models: These models consider the mechanical interactions between the reservoir rock and the injected fluids. They are particularly important for reservoirs prone to compaction or subsidence, where changes in pore pressure due to injection can alter reservoir properties and affect oil recovery.

The choice of model depends on the specific reservoir characteristics, available data, and project objectives. Complex models offer more accurate predictions but require more data and computational resources. Simpler models provide quicker results but might not capture all the nuances of the reservoir behavior.

Chapter 3: Software for Tertiary Recovery Design and Simulation

A range of specialized software packages are used in the design, simulation, and optimization of tertiary recovery projects. These tools aid in reservoir characterization, planning injection strategies, and predicting production performance.

1. Reservoir Simulation Software: The core software for tertiary recovery projects. Leading examples include:

  • CMG (Computer Modelling Group): Offers a suite of reservoir simulation software for various applications, including thermal and chemical recovery.
  • Schlumberger Eclipse: A widely used reservoir simulator with advanced capabilities for modelling complex reservoir phenomena.
  • Roxar RMS (Reservoir Management System): A comprehensive reservoir simulation and management platform.
  • TNavigator: A powerful visualization and interpretation software used in conjunction with simulation models.

2. Data Management and Visualization Software: Essential for managing large datasets and visualizing reservoir properties and simulation results. Examples include:

  • Petrel: A widely used software for seismic interpretation, reservoir modelling, and production forecasting.
  • Landmark OpenWorks: Another leading software suite for integrated reservoir characterization and management.

3. Geomechanics Software: For modelling the mechanical behavior of the reservoir:

  • ABAQUS: A general-purpose finite element analysis software that can be adapted to reservoir geomechanics.
  • ANSYS: Another widely used finite element analysis software for geomechanics applications.

4. Specialized Software: Software for specific tertiary recovery methods, such as specialized steam injection simulators or CO2 flooding simulators, is available from various vendors.

The choice of software depends on the specific project needs, budget, and available expertise. Many companies utilize a combination of software packages to address various aspects of tertiary recovery design and optimization.

Chapter 4: Best Practices in Tertiary Recovery

Successful tertiary recovery projects require careful planning, execution, and monitoring. Best practices include:

1. Thorough Reservoir Characterization: A detailed understanding of the reservoir geology, fluid properties, and rock properties is essential for selecting the appropriate tertiary recovery technique and designing an effective injection strategy. This includes high-quality seismic surveys, well logs, core analysis, and fluid analysis.

2. Optimization of Injection Strategy: Reservoir simulation models are used to optimize the location, rate, and type of injected fluids to maximize oil recovery. Factors such as injection well placement, injection rate, and fluid composition are carefully considered.

3. Monitoring and Control: Regular monitoring of reservoir pressure, temperature, and fluid production is crucial to detect any issues and adjust the injection strategy as needed. This includes deploying downhole sensors and monitoring production data.

4. Well Integrity Management: Maintaining the integrity of injection and production wells is essential to prevent fluid leakage and ensure efficient operation. Regular well integrity tests and maintenance are necessary.

5. Risk Management: Tertiary recovery projects involve high costs and uncertainties. A thorough risk assessment should be conducted to identify potential challenges and develop mitigation strategies. This includes assessing geological risks, operational risks, and economic risks.

6. Environmental Considerations: Tertiary recovery methods, especially those involving chemical injection or CO2 injection, can have environmental impacts. Best practices include minimizing environmental footprint, complying with environmental regulations, and implementing environmental monitoring programs.

7. Data Integration and Management: Efficient data management and integration are crucial for successful project execution. This includes storing and accessing data from various sources, such as seismic surveys, well logs, production data, and simulation results.

Chapter 5: Case Studies in Tertiary Recovery

Several successful tertiary recovery projects demonstrate the effectiveness of these techniques in maximizing oil production. These case studies showcase the application of various techniques, challenges faced, and lessons learned. (Note: Specific case studies would be inserted here. Details would vary depending on the project and would ideally include quantitative data on oil recovery improvements.)

Example Case Study Outline (to be filled with specific project data):

  • Project Name and Location: [Insert details]
  • Reservoir Characteristics: [Description of reservoir geology, fluid properties, etc.]
  • Tertiary Recovery Method Employed: [e.g., Steam Injection, CO2 Flooding, etc.]
  • Project Goals: [Objectives, target oil recovery increase]
  • Implementation Details: [Description of injection strategy, well placement, monitoring techniques]
  • Results: [Quantifiable results, such as increased oil production, reduction in viscosity, improvement in sweep efficiency]
  • Challenges Faced: [Issues encountered during project implementation and their solutions]
  • Lessons Learned: [Key insights and takeaways from the project]

Multiple case studies, each detailing a different tertiary recovery project with various methods and outcomes, should be included in this chapter to provide a comprehensive understanding of the practical applications of tertiary oil recovery methods.

Similar Terms
Reservoir EngineeringProject Planning & SchedulingDrilling & Well CompletionGeology & Exploration
  • Tertiary Tertiary: A Defining Era in O…
Oil & Gas Processing

Comments


No Comments
POST COMMENT
captcha
Back